Posted on 12/19/2016 7:15:37 AM PST by drop 50 and fire for effect
The new president owes nothing to the ‘Bush Barnacles’
The media have paid much attention to how Donald Trump broke through to blue-collar voters in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania and captured the presidency. Trump is certainly assembling what might prove to be a new GOP coalition. But one shouldn’t forget that Trump’s temperament cost him upscale Republican voters in key suburbs. To solidify his reelection chances, he will have to overcome their doubts with policy successes that assuage their concerns about his rough edges.
Trump won an impressive victory, carrying 31 out of 50 states. But in several of them — including key states such as Georgia, Arizona, and Texas — he won a smaller percentage of the vote than Mitt Romney did. Indeed, nationally, Trump won 46.2 percent of votes cast, whereas Romney won 47.2 percent. In the 37 states considered “non-swing” or uncompetitive this year, Hillary Clinton’s margin of victory was greater than Barack Obama’s in 2012.
Much of Trump’s weakness with upscale, suburban Republicans can be traced to the hostility of the Bush family. They viewed Trump’s primary victory as a hostile takeover of the party they had long dominated — a Bush was on the national GOP ticket for president or vice president in every election between 1980 and 2008 save for one (1996). With his attacks on the Iraq War, his humiliation of Jeb Bush in the GOP primaries, and his characterization of George W. Bush’s presidency as “weak,” Trump clearly alienated the Bush base. Texas’s seventh congressional district, the wealthy Houston enclave that elected George H. W. Bush to Congress in 1966 and that has remained in GOP hands ever since, saw a stunning reversal in its voting patterns. In 2012, Mitt Romney carried the seventh district with 61 percent of the two-party vote. In 2016, Hillary Clinton actually beat Donald Trump in the district by 51 percent to 49 percent.
A big reason was clearly the hostility of the Bushes to Trump. George W. Bush made it known that he left the presidential line blank on his ballot. His father, former president George H. W. Bush, was “outed” as a Never Trumper by a member of the Kennedy clan, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, in October. She posted a photo of her and the former president on Facebook with the caption: “The President told me he’s voting for Hillary!!” She followed up in an interview with Politico by saying: “That’s what he said.”
The Bushes were obviously not alone in their antipathy toward Trump. Republicans who had served top roles in both Bush administrations signed an open letter in mid October declaring that Trump in their view was not qualified for office. The former Bush officials included Christine Todd Whitman, who ran George W. Bush’s Environmental Protection Agency, and Mary Peters, who headed his Transportation Department. They warned that Trump fails to exemplify the traits the Republican party holds dear.
Nor was theirs the only letter from former Bush officials. In August, a group of GOP national-security experts warned that Trump “would be the most reckless president in American history.”
Those signing the letter included former CIA and National Security Agency director Michael Hayden; former director of national intelligence and deputy secretary of state John Negroponte; and two Homeland Security secretaries under Bush, Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff. They were joined by Robert Zoellick, a former U.S. trade representative and deputy secretary of state.
Conspicuous by their absence from the letter were former secretaries of state Henry Kissinger, Condoleezza Rice and James Baker.
Trump didn’t wait long to blast the letter, denouncing the signatories in a statement. In part, it read:
"The names on this letter are the ones the American people should look to for answers on why the world is a mess, and we thank them for coming forward so everyone in the country knows who deserves the blame for making the world such a dangerous place. They are nothing more than the failed Washington elite looking to hold on to their power, and it’s time they are held accountable for their actions.
These insiders — along with Hillary Clinton — are the owners of the disastrous decisions to invade Iraq, allow Americans to die at Benghazi, and they are the ones who allowed the rise of ISIS. Yet despite these failures, they think they are entitled to use their favor trading to land taxpayer-funded government contracts and speaking fees."
It’s clear that the gulf between the “Bushies” and the “Trumpsters” isn’t likely to be bridged anytime soon. That is a good thing. Any other Republican president-elect would have been under enormous pressure to bring in former Bush officials to staff cabinet agencies with safe, don’t-rock-the-boat appointees. “I call them Bush Barnacles,” top Trump strategist Steve Bannon told me earlier this year. Instead, Trump owes next than nothing to the Bushes and has selected only one of George W. Bush’s former cabinet officials to head a department: Elaine Chao at Transportation, who also was the most conservative member of the cabinet during George W. Bush’s two terms.
Instead, Trump has largely turned to an eclectic mix of top business executives (Rex Tillerson at State, Wilbur Ross at Commerce), former generals (James Mattis at Defense and John Kelly at Homeland Security) and bureaucracy busters (Scott Pruitt at the Environmental Protection Agency and Jeff Sessions at Justice).
Trump will no doubt be careful to cement his support with the blue-collar voters who delivered him the election. In keeping with his promises to these supporters, he’ll probably aim to renegotiate trade deals without touching off trade wars, clear away barriers to job creation, and reassert American leadership overseas. For someone who needs to solidify his political standing for 2020, succeeding in those policies would represent the best possible political revenge against the Bushes and his many other critics.
"It’s clear that the gulf between the “Bushies” and the “Trumpsters” isn’t likely to be bridged anytime soon. That is a good thing(emphasis added). Any other Republican president-elect would have been under enormous pressure to bring in former Bush officials to staff cabinet agencies with safe, don’t-rock-the-boat appointees."
Trump was elected to "drain the swamp." His cabinet picks are almost all experienced individuals, but who have had little to do with policy making. From all appearances, for good, bad, or indifferent, he intends to make good on that promise.
However, as Mr. Fund points out, he has to have significant policy successes to deter an establishment counter-attack in 2020.
GA, AZ, and TX have been overrun by illegals and liberals escaping the hell they created in other states. That’s why Trump got a smaller % of votes. Poor analysis.
He isn't formally President yet and already some sectors have come to heel.
The supreme irony of the Trump versus Bush feud is that Bush views Trump as some intolerant Philistine, with the implication being that Bush is part of the “moderate” more reasonable part of the GOP. Yet one of the major themes of Bush’s 2004 campaign was opposing gay marriage. Trump didn’t raise the issue at all and said he was OK with the Supreme Court ruling on the issue. Now that’s not to say that we should or shouldn’t have gay marriage. But it always amazes me that the Bushes view themselves as these tolerant, moderate types when their campaigns were filled with cultural wedge issues. Remember when Bush Sr. won? A lot of people said it was because he made black crime a wedge issue.
duhhhh....since DJT won without those elitist globalist ‘pubs in the wealthy suburbs this time, shouldn’t we assume he doesn’t need them? Who writes this idiocy?
Ain’t gonna be no Bush Counterattack in 2020.
Ain’t 3% of us who will EVER vote for a Bush again under ANY circumstances.
They’d get more votes running O.J. Simpson.
Just my hunch, but I always believed Barbara Bush was the Valerie Jarret for HW, W and Jeb. She has that ‘bossy’ demeanor.
I have commented before that W would probably have been happier flying planes, riding a horse on his ranch and enjoying a private life, but ‘Barbara’s family business’ was a duty.
He may not have won the election if he didn’t attack the Bushes.
“But one shouldn’t forget that Trump’s temperament cost him upscale Republican voters in key suburbs. To solidify his reelection chances, he will have to overcome their doubts with policy successes that assuage their concerns about his rough edges.”
They’re already talking about his reelection?
It’s really fascinating how often NPR quotes McCain. Just related...
[Who writes this idiocy?]
GOP-e sympathizer
Regarding W, I agree.
There was no Republican candidate in this election. This was a race between a Democrat and an independent who hijacked the Republican nomination process to get on the ballot.
If anything, Hillary Clinton was the Republican in this race. Her administration would likely be nearly identical to what we saw with George W. Bush in office ... which explains why so many of the @ssholes who polluted his administration were comfortable supporting her.
We may never again have an opportunity such as this for a “Fresh Start” in our lifetimes.
Drain the swamp?
It’s more like “Pump the Septic Tank.”
My spin on this is - there are no "Bushies" outside of a few bitter-clingers in Texas and within the DC Beltway. The voters simply do NOT care about any Bush "faction" and the Bush family power is going to disappear entirely within 90 days of Trump being in office.
"Upscale Republican voters" translates to "Elitists who sneer at the Middle Class as trailer trash"....
If thosebin these “key suburbs” don’t get it yet, they will have to face the reality that they really aren’t key any more. They lost.
A Bush endorsement would have been the kiss of death for Trump. A lot of the Rust Belters would have seen him as just another Republican and would have stayed with the Democrats. I think Trump knew that and that's why he went out of his way to insult and alienate them during the campaign.
“But one shouldn’t forget that Trump’s temperament cost him upscale Republican voters in key suburbs. To solidify his reelection chances, he will have to overcome their doubts with policy successes that assuage their concerns about his rough edges.”
I don’t agree with this statement. Trump won this election without the so-called upscale Republicans. My guess is that increasingly more Democrats may come to see the light as the economy recovers, and Trump may win in 2020 by a larger margin.
The Bushes were obviously not alone in their antipathy toward Trump.
***************************
Fund never addresses the real reason for the Bushes and their allies antipathy towards Trump.
He broke the stranglehold of the Cheap Labor Express on the GOP.
In every election since the last amnesty, the GOP has nominated an amnesty candidate.
This has effectively blocked the citizens from stopping the illegal alien inundation.
The Cheap Labor Express Republicans were committed to keeping the citizens from retaining the rule of law and their country.
This time they got Trumped and that is why they are so steamed.
Actually, it was a good analysis. Trump ran poorly in many more heavily Republican suburban counties populated by upscale, white collar “moderate” Republicans such as Loudoun in Virginia, Chester and Bucks in Pennsylvania, Morris in New Jersey, Gwinnett and Cobb in Georgia, among many others. Part of this was the photo of the ancient leering Bush Sr. with RFK’s daughter, having “endorsed” Clinton (really disgusting for those of us who knew he wasn’t any good but held our noses to vote for him in 1988 since he had been Reagan’s VP) and his dolt son, GW, who did his best to wreck the Republican Party and supposedly left his presidential ballot line blank. No, Bushes, we don’t need you, stay with your friends, the Clintons, you are finished with the base of this Party or at least enough of us that you will never win another primary for a national election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.