Why? Is that the only way to defend against leftist attacks on religion?
How can there be laws for something that is not defined?
Is that the only way to defend against leftist attacks on religion?
1. No.
2. Redefining things to their liking is part of the leftist attack plan and should be resisted.
3. I wrote "...regardless of what people do as a matter of religion independent of state law".
4. You're drifting or driving the discussion away from the concern I expressed in my original post responding to the article. To refresh you on what I wrote in Post 5:
Does this mean there’s no legal basis for marriage in North Dakota?SCOTUS can declare legislation unconstitutional, but SCOTUS can’t issue new legislation.
I believe more than one State has not changed there marriage laws as a result of the SCOTUS decision. Is there no legal basis for marriage in those states?
Your response was "Is all marriage “gay marriage” to you? I don’t understand what you’re trying to say", the first part of which is a non-sequitor and the second part of which I agree with even though I've tried to remedy it.
If the legal basis for marriage has been eliminated it's going to get interesting as soon as some lawyer figures it out in a divorce, survivors, or last will and testament dispute.