Replies

Thank you for referencing that article Cheerio. Please note that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"Obama Leaves U.S.A $9,335,000,000,000 Deeper in Debt"

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Patriots are reminded that the Founding States gave the power of the purse uniquely to the House of Representatives, not the POTUS, evidenced by Clause 1 of Section 7 of Article I. So while lawless Obama’s pen and phone were a part of the problem concerning the national debt, corrupt career lawmakers who had the constitutional authority to stop Obama’s reckless spending, but wrongly hid behind last-term Obama with respect to the debt, are the real problem imo.

And speaking of corrupt career federal lawmakers ...

Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!

Remember in November ’18 !

Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.

Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist justices off of the bench.

Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February ‘18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.

Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.

Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed below.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.