His findings indicate that he is NOT PRO LIFE. Not a good Scalia replacement....
Do you have any evidence of that to share? All I have found is that Schlaffly didn’t like that he didn’t use the term “unborn child” in his findings.
If he’s a strict constitutionalist, I would think he would leave the issue to the states—which is what I believe they should do. (I know there are those who disagree with me, but if you’re gonna follow the Constitution, I think that’s the correct resolution.)