[Garth Tater]

Great article. Not. Six paragraphs of spin, presenting the shootee as such a reasonable guy not interested in retribution at all, before finally in the seventh paragraph getting around to mentioning that he just might have been attacking the man that shot him and that the action might very well have been a case of legitimate self-defense.

"Campus Safety Magazine," just doing what leftist rags do, hiding the truth.

[21twelve]

“... that he just might have been attacking the man...”

From the videos I have seen on youtube that seems to be the case. I’m sure that the cops interviewed closer witnessess and gathered better video too. Then released the shooter when he turned himself in, which says a lot on what the story is based on the evidence.