Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

notice the libs say nothing about the fraud here ... Where as DNC emails were fraudly obtained ...
1 posted on 01/29/2017 2:22:10 AM PST by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: 11th_VA

I am actually glad to hear the video. Puts disloyal and weak kneed Republicans out in public. Let them squirm. Let them be replaced.


2 posted on 01/29/2017 2:38:12 AM PST by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp is not party specific. Lyn' Ted is still a liar, Good riddance to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

This can’t happen. You can’t have some psycho bitch nobody knows about getting access to the President and VP.


3 posted on 01/29/2017 2:41:54 AM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

the left has become unhinged


4 posted on 01/29/2017 2:47:04 AM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

The press just issued a correction; they mistook Lindsay Graham for a boozing, low rent, fake politician’s wife.

But, yes, he leaked that audio...


5 posted on 01/29/2017 2:48:32 AM PST by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

idn’t the guy from Project Veritas get charged and convicted for this same type of impersonation to enter a Federal office?


8 posted on 01/29/2017 2:58:18 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

Since they know who this person is, why hasn’t she been arrested?


9 posted on 01/29/2017 3:03:12 AM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA; kristen; Jim Robinson; ExTexasRedhead; SaveFerris; jag
"Pennsylvania's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. Pennsylvania makes it a crime to intercept or record a telephone call or conversation unless all parties to the conversation consent."

I am not a lawyer, however, it appears that what she did was illegal in Pennsylvania. There may have also have been Federal crimes committed; falsifying information given to Secret Service agents. You cannot lie to law enforcement, and you cannot present fake ID to them.

Of course, standards are only to be followed by Republicans. The Democrats can break any law they wish.

11 posted on 01/29/2017 3:08:02 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
Remember when the press went ballistic about that couple who crashed a dinner at the White House? They simply dressed really sharp and showed up and were let into the place past the Secret Service and everyone else. It was a major security breach and the media insisted there could be none of that.

But that was when the president was Barack Obama.

When the same thing happens, and just as serious a potential threat to the safety of the President and Vice-President, with blatantly nefarious purpose but this time it's Donald Trump and Mike Pence...

The left isn't condemning THAT. Instead its chuckling about its own cleverness.

The mainstream media truly has become an enemy of the republic.

15 posted on 01/29/2017 3:27:49 AM PST by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
Libs are all for fraud yet this action is the equivalent of the break in at the democrats office in the Watergate hotel.

Who put her up to it? What did they know and when did they know it? The Washington Post was a leader in the Watergate investigation asking these questions and now they are an accessory after the crime!

17 posted on 01/29/2017 3:38:37 AM PST by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA; Liz; Ann Archy; Jet Jaguar; All
Again, I am not a lawyer, but we have plenty of good ones here on FR.


http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/LI/consCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&ttl=18&div=0&chpt=57

I read the language. They way I read it, unless there was consent given by all parties (which there clearly was not), then I believe she violated the law.

Again, I am not an attorney.

23 posted on 01/29/2017 4:00:02 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA; SkyPilot

Given that a primary duty of the Secret Service Protection detail is to vet guests at events where the Pres. and VP are present, one has to wonder exactly how many politically unstable Kerry O’Gradys are on staff.

Recall that for a background check photo IDs and Soc-Sec. numbers are required to be presented before the event when an invitation has been issued. That starts the background check which may or may not raise flags causing a deeper investigation.

And of course that photo ID plus invitation must be presented at time of admission.

Where did this woman obtain information necessary for the forged ID, and invitation in time to produce such and who did the work.

And most important, who in the Secret Service checked her name and documents at the entry point? Was she given a wave through by a Senior GOP staffer? Who was that?

Once again Anwar Sadat and Indira Gandhi were unavailable for comment. (for those unfamiliar with the demise of these leaders, do a search...)


24 posted on 01/29/2017 4:00:50 AM PST by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

When James O’Keefe put on a hard hat and high-vis vest and simply pretended to be a telephone repair guy in federal office, I believe he was put in jail and he got a misdemeanor.

They had been trying to make it a felony and had even talked about terrorism and other some crazy stuff.

it was him and his Asian colleague, I believe.


26 posted on 01/29/2017 4:11:58 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

I think a bunch of senators and congressmen should make it abundantly clear that whoever was in charge of security of this event makes very sure that this sort of nonsense never happens again.

Simple argument: What if that person had been an assassin?

It is not unimaginable that an assemblage of Republican leaders could be at extreme risk. What if their food or drink was poisoned? We should also assume that a security lapse like this could have used pre-positioned explosives or firearms, and who knows what all else.

There are a LOT of truly evil people out there that would want nothing better, and both President Trump and congress are their dream targets. The Secret Service and Federal Protective Service (FPS) need to be on the ball.

The FPS has only 900 officers to guard over 9,000 buildings, as well as 13,000 very lightly trained contractor security guards (aka rent-a-cops). Congress may want to revisit this.


27 posted on 01/29/2017 4:12:27 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Friday, January 20, 2017. Reparations end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

Where was the US Secret Service???


28 posted on 01/29/2017 4:21:18 AM PST by Rapscallion ( Equal justice is an American principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

It’s Russia.....what? It’s an f’ing Democrat? Say it ain’t so!


33 posted on 01/29/2017 4:43:39 AM PST by Chgogal (A woman who votes for Hillary is voting with her vagina and not her brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

What? No meeting rooms available in the senate or house buildings? They have to go “off campus”? Does that make them feel more important? Anyway, my only comment I can come up with is the use of the word “snuck” in their. report. I think “sneaked” is more grammatically acceptable.


37 posted on 01/29/2017 4:45:48 AM PST by bigspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

This is so embarrassing on so many levels. The GOP couldn’t count to two if you gave them two sticks. WTF


38 posted on 01/29/2017 4:45:58 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

Bkmk


40 posted on 01/29/2017 4:51:19 AM PST by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

It was the Russians. They outfitted the intruder. They trained her. They hacked the retreat.

...eyes rolling...


42 posted on 01/29/2017 4:52:46 AM PST by Principled (OMG I'm so tired of all this winning....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

When will the left realize that we don’t mind when RINOs take it in the shorts...? That said, this is a very poorly written article. Whom did this woman allegedly misrepresent herself to? Who was she? Who knew what when? I think there is much more to this story that the paper is either ignoring or spinning.


43 posted on 01/29/2017 4:54:52 AM PST by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson