[stocksthatgoup]

.............. Closing Argument

Second-guessing Trump’s decision is for elections, not judges. The Supreme Court long ago rejected such second-guessing as impermissible. The Boston’s judge’s thoughtful and deliberate decision follows the precedents, as the law compels. The Seattle judge’s decision tries to substitute for the legislative branches, which the law condemns. In the ultimate outcome of these decisions, memories of Super Bowls past will prove prescient: Like the Patriots, Boston will best Seattle once again

[Bullish]

Just watch how many judges start knocking down President Trumps EO’s. The same judges who didn’t make a peep about all of Obama’s unconstitutional shenanigans.

[lavaroise]

Immigration
is a matter of military national security. Since when civilian judges could object to a President’s drone strike in foreign territories or blocking non citizens from
entering?

What the heck is going on?

I would 1. declare a military emergency to man international airport entries and borders under military rules
2. Prosecute those judges instigating a virtual military coup through agitation and civil war in rulings seeking to undermine this authority

[Cubs Fan]

Certainly we want to win, (and should) but how long will this take. Anyone have any idea?

BTW one piddly federal judge stoppiung a president who is clearly following the law is not a “check and balance” it is judicial supremacy.

[jazminerose]

Trump’s team need only cite the Constitution as controlling authority.

[iontheball]

How is it that this District Court Judge has jurisdiction over the entire nation?

[An.American.Expatriate]

I’m getting a bit confused here. What argument are they bringing that limits the discretionary power the President has under 8 USC 1182(f)? I have NOT seen the reasoning and can not understand how any judge could read it in a way that would allow them to limit or question the President’s decision. (I know they ignore it ...)

Does anyone know what the arguments are?

[Makana]

This will now go to a federal Appellate Court, then to the Supreme Court (4-4). Do I have this right?

[central_va]

Any Federal Judge that orders a halt to an EO should be dragged in front of congress and grilled the next day. Their life should be made hell. There should be a fast track to the SCOTUS to overturn the order. Then impeach the judge. Fihgt back damn it!

[billyboy15]

A Seattle Fed Judge declared his oral intention to sign an order limiting some aspects of the executive order.

Anyone know which parts of this order he is attempting too limit?