To: katana
Akhenaten - Pharaoh of Eqypt, circa
(1348-1338 BCE)
http://www.usu.edu/markdamen/1320hist&civ/chapters/10AKHEN.htm#n105
Notice anything missing from ~his~ anatomy?
XXY/Androgen Insensitive/????
Consider the context of Akhenaten's religious revolution - and the genocidal murder of male infants: Was that an attempt at Royal fem-social engineering?
34 posted on
02/08/2017 9:55:10 AM PST by
HLPhat
(It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
To: HLPhat
There's debate over the overtly androgynous representations of Akhenaten. Were they unusually accurate or was his "feminine side" purposefully emphasized? The royal practice of marriage between siblings, reenacting the legend of Isis and Osiris, produced imbeciles and grossly deformed pharaohs. So it's theoretically possible Akhenaten was some sort of genetic freak. His remains are probably those found in tomb KV55. If they are DNA comparison confirms he was the biologic father of Tutankhamun (whose remains also show signs of genetic deformities) and so he did at least have the basic male working parts, even if they're not on display on that statue.
41 posted on
02/08/2017 10:36:23 AM PST by
katana
To: HLPhat
Missing parts - his and others - were hacked off by early Christians - sometime after the fall oof the Ptolemies.
65 posted on
02/08/2017 3:14:25 PM PST by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: HLPhat
Obviously a vegan!
The Future is Female...
70 posted on
02/08/2017 3:22:21 PM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: HLPhat
88 posted on
02/08/2017 7:12:21 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(patriots win, Communists and Socialist Just-Us Warriors lose)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson