Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

I agree with most of that, but we still have to remember no one has ever seen anything actually evolve, it is supposedly too gradual and takes to long. You would need time travel of some sort. I guess it’s always only going to be a theory until we can observe it happening. The left doesn’t treat it like a theory, they declare it dogma and become micro-aggressed if someone doesn’t buy it.

Freegards


32 posted on 02/26/2017 8:07:21 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Ransomed

> I agree with most of that, but we still have to remember no one has ever seen anything actually evolve...

Actually every time an individual animal or human being dies without reproducing, its species evolves in the direction of other individuals that do reproduce. Even within historical times some major changes have taken place (on the Galapagos Islands, for instance) — that is, in selecting among the genes that are already there. We can see that happening . (And how could it not happen?)

Also the breeding of animals by human beings (artificial selection) — which produces some rather dramatic changes — mirrors Darwinian natural selection except that human beings consciously select desirable characteristics (and, once again, use the currently available genes). The changes possible that way, though, are limited to the current gene pool.

So how does evolution go beyond that? Through mutation of the genes themselves. As far as we know, that happens randomly. Natural selection is much slower because it has to rely on these random mutations in the genes themselves (which happen seldom, and most of which are harmful). It’s common sense that helpful mutations — however seldom they occur — would tend to be preserved, though, and lead to modifications over long stretches of time.

Also, if rather than natural selection, God himself were guiding the natural world, what kind of God would that be? In many respects nature is beautiful and interesting, but it’s extremely cruel and unjust, not at all like the gospel preached in the New Testament.


37 posted on 02/26/2017 11:34:55 PM PST by GJones2 (Discrepancies in the Genesis accounts of creation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Ransomed

Ransomed: “I guess it’s always only going to be a theory until we can observe it happening. “

Correct, by definition in science what we observe are called “facts” and explanations “hypotheses” or “theories” depending on the degree of confirmation.
Evolution is a confirmed theory, though many of its key tenets are observed facts.
What recent history tells us is that natural evolution can be hugely speeded up through humans using animal husbandry.

Recent years’ DNA analyses also show us precisely how closely or distantly various populations are related, then correlating with the fossil record, how long ago they branched apart.

But new discoveries and analyses every day throw old ideas into doubt and raise up new hypotheses.
That’s just one element making science the opposite of our religious faith.


50 posted on 02/28/2017 9:54:49 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson