“Do you have one peer study that refutes any of the studies? Just one.”
Did you mean to say peer-reviewed studies?
You should know that for many decades no study with heretical findings could possibly have been favorably peer-reviewed or published, even if it were somehow conducted.
Way back in the seventies, before the PC, before the internet, before digital storage, there were articles deconstructing the junk science, and attempts to replicate studies showing second-hand smoke harm failed again and again.
Do I still have those magazines from the seventies? Really?
You should know from other issues that “science” has been in the grasp of Orwellian tyrants for decades. Their refusal to do honest science and report honestly on this issue does not constitute support for their lies.
It seems that the truth might finally escape, though, so just keep preaching while Trump pulls the temple down around your ears.
I’ll take that as a NO.