The Dread-Scott case was precedent at the SCOTUS for many more years than has been Roe V Wade. In neither case does precedent mean that a precedent cannot, rightfully even, be challenged by the SCOTUS.
Or challenged by Congress.
if they only had a spine.
Slavery was a super precedent.
Women not voting was a super precedent.
Bibles and God in public schools was a super precedent here, 180 years even before the usa.
But the liberals fought to destroy them. If its a precedent they dont like it doesnt matter.
Liberal and progressive are strong synonyms for hypocrite.
Well, not really.
Scott versus Sanford decision: March 6, 1857
US Civil War: 1861-1865
13 Amendment (making slavery illegal): December 6, 1865
8 & 1/2 years (of Scott versus Sanford)
Roe versus Wade: January 22, 1973
44 years and counting. Meanwhile, millions of dead babies. Far more dead babies than all the slaves plus all the deaths in the Civil War combined.