Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/03/2017 7:41:42 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hojczyk

According to Housley, it was done at the direction of those “very high up” and was done so for “a significant amount of time,” which he described as “unprecedented” and “blockbuster.”

Transcript as follows:

We don’t know who spoke to Devin Nunes. We know it’s not someone at the White House. We don’t know who spoke to the White House about this other than what Nunes has said in front of press conferences. The sources we are talking to are separate from both of those entities. They don’t really have a horse in this game. They are frustrated with the way they say the agencies are being politicized more than they have seen before in their careers. And one reason they are speaking out is because of that. The second reason is because Nunes came out in front of the cameras and has his finger on it, they say and want to make sure it is done correctly.

What we’ve learned is this — from multiple sources is that it’s all about intelligence-gathering methods. The fact is, a lot of these men and women in the intelligence communities did not want to speak about what’s going on because they were concerned about those methods being known. But now they figure they might as well at least clarify things since Nunes has been leaked to by someone they don’t know or at least they tell me they don’t know. We know that there was this — there was surveillance of Trump and people close to Donald Trump including some supporters for up to a year before inauguration. That information was disseminated we’re told through NSA channels. It’s unprecedented the way this was done. The mention of U.S. citizens is supposed to be masked. That means basically taken out of the report.

So for example, if I call somebody in Bulgaria, and that’s picked up somehow by our agencies and there’s nothing there involving national security, there’s nothing there involving a crime, that report would come out and it would say “American number one” or my name would not be there. What I’m told now is that when these reports came out, names were there and that is unprecedented. Basically, they say the information that’s unmasking, these names of Americans who had done nothing wrong was disseminated to all of NSC, some at DoD, Clapper, Brennan — basically the people at the top.

They also say I’m told Rice knew about this possibly as well. Now, I know there are some reports out there that she was the one who ordered this. We do not know who reported this because we have not spoken to Devin Nunes about it. He has not at least told us these things. So, we don’t know what papers he saw. Our sources don’t know what papers he saw. They just tell us about the information about unmasking names from Donald Trump and his team and his family was disseminated to a very select few at the top and was done so for a significant amount of time. And that is blockbuster, guys. As far as we know hasn’t been done at least in modern times when it comes to this type of thing. Also, as we look down at some of my notes here going through this, that there were also additional unmasking as well and, again, as far as we can tell, none of this had anything to do with national security.


2 posted on 04/03/2017 7:42:24 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Clapper, Brennan, Rice, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, ValJar....


3 posted on 04/03/2017 7:43:49 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

It is a major crime to “unmask” the US persons incidentally captured in foreign intel surveillance. Where is our beloved FBI on this?


4 posted on 04/03/2017 7:44:41 AM PDT by Rapscallion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Click The Pic To Donate



5 posted on 04/03/2017 7:45:22 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Annnnnd like the dems Russia ruse, there doesn’t seem to be any evidence besides here say that this is true, sadly


8 posted on 04/03/2017 7:50:05 AM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Name names. Not “someone high up”... name them.


13 posted on 04/03/2017 8:04:16 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Looks like it was Susan Rice...

What the heck was she doing even looking at this info? And when did BO know?


21 posted on 04/03/2017 8:39:24 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF OBAMACARE REPEAL THAT IS WORSE THAN KEEPING IT ONE MORE DAY***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

The “Surveillance was for a YEAR. Even Trump ‘Supporters’ were survailed and their names unmasked.


22 posted on 04/03/2017 8:41:44 AM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

I’d bet $1000 Obammy first started surveillance on Trump back when Trump was going after Obammy’s birth certificate.


26 posted on 04/03/2017 9:24:01 AM PDT by kjam22 (America need forgiveness from God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

“***So for example, if I call somebody in Bulgaria, and that’s picked up somehow by our agencies and there’s nothing there involving national security, there’s nothing there involving a crime, that report would come out and it would say “American number one” or my name would not be there. What I’m told now is that when these reports came out, names were there and that is unprecedented. Basically, they say the information that’s unmasking, these names of Americans who had done nothing wrong was disseminated to all of NSC, some at DoD, Clapper, Brennan — basically the people at the top.***”

1. They should be running a trawler which catches anything and everything in its net.

2. They should destroy any records not Germain and particular to a warrant which would contain the names of the individuals who the givernment has “Probable” Cause to believe they committed a particular crime .

What the givernment does is akin to obtaining a warrant of probable cause and searching every room in a building for their suspect and the evidence to support their allegation.

Never mind that the suspect likely did not have access to every area of the building.

They will sweep up huge swaths of information they don’t need and just keep it.


29 posted on 04/03/2017 9:35:17 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson