Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ingraham: Coverage of Rice Bombshell a ‘Low Point for the American Media’
lifezette.com ^ | 04 Apr 2017

Posted on 04/04/2017 7:50:50 AM PDT by Helicondelta

In the wake of bombshell reports Monday indicating former national security adviser Susan Rice had “unmasked” associates of President Donald Trump, the mainstream media largely ignored the story or even flatly denied the seriousness of the revelations.

“This is such a low point for the American media,” LifeZette editor-in-chief Laura Ingraham said on “Fox & Friends” on Fox News Tuesday. “I mean, they have been pounding the Russia story for weeks — even though top officials have said they have no evidence that any Russia involvement in our election or attempt to meddle in our election had any effect. They stay on that story.”

Ingraham referred to the infamous interviews Rice gave in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. During an interview with CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” Rice blamed the assault on outrage over a YouTube video.

(Excerpt) Read more at lifezette.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2017 7:50:50 AM PDT by Helicondelta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

They will go lower and lower.

Just wait.


2 posted on 04/04/2017 7:53:42 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

They aren’t even close to their low point.

Before they go totally bankrupt, they will go full Pravda and propaganda mode.


3 posted on 04/04/2017 7:55:10 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

The fact that MSM has been silent on this scandal, tells u how big
this scandal really is. This scandal will make Watergate look like a
cheap warm up act.

The MSM knows this and are very, very afraid.
Hence the silence.

But this scandal will continue to grow and at some point, will explode
bigger than Watergate.

If Rice is so innocent, why isn’t she out on TV like she was on Bengazi
explaining it?


4 posted on 04/04/2017 7:59:40 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta
All this stuff has been hiding in the ginormous lamestream #fakenews file.

And like Maxine Waters says: Ain't nobody got time for that.

5 posted on 04/04/2017 7:59:42 AM PDT by Slyfox (Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

They are not journalists they are just Democrats.


6 posted on 04/04/2017 8:06:07 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

It used to be the media exposed cover-ups, now they lead and direct them.


7 posted on 04/04/2017 8:06:51 AM PDT by Newtoidaho (Proud member of Trump's army of online trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

The media will start saying it’s Conbi Rice, not Susan.


8 posted on 04/04/2017 8:06:56 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

The media will start saying it’s Conbi Rice, not Susan.


9 posted on 04/04/2017 8:07:04 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Helicondelta

I watched CBS Scott Pelley last night to see how they dismissed it. Sure enough, he interviewed their sour WH correspondent, she said really nothing new, he thanked her for dismissing it, he moved on, all said, maybe 5 seconds for the story.


11 posted on 04/04/2017 8:09:24 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs
Huh?

-PJ

12 posted on 04/04/2017 8:11:01 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

How ironic, a known “fake news” provider (CNN) attempting to get people to ignore a “truthful” news story. Guess they know the difference and want to convince followers to see their side of the news instead. How obvious........


13 posted on 04/04/2017 8:12:02 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

difference between Watergate and this scandal- is there are millions of wannabe Woodward and Bernsteins on the web looking to make their bones, or to just take down the man.

In this case the man they are after is Obama, the information is out there and Trump is feeding the sharks just enough to get them in to feeding frenzy.

Also the MSM will be non relevant very soon as most will not believe their bloviating lies

Sit back and enjoy the ride, keep the powder dry and popcorn popping


14 posted on 04/04/2017 8:14:22 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

I don’t understand your post...... are you calling Laura a whore?


15 posted on 04/04/2017 8:24:45 AM PDT by volunbeer (Clinton Cash = Proof of Corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter
"In this case the man they are after is Obama, the information is out there and Trump is feeding the sharks just enough to get them in to feeding frenzy."

Is that a typo? Do you seriously that that anyone in the MSM wants to "bring down" OBAMA??? The MSM kissed his butt for nine years, and the guy that thousands of journalist would love to bring down is Donald Trump. That's why they are ignoring or spinning the Susan Rice story as a non-story or a false story.
16 posted on 04/04/2017 8:27:12 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

not the MSM

The web dwellers will get Obama, not the MSM

Actually laughing that someone would think that MSM would go after the 1

Thank you for misunderstanding my badly written post - I needed a good laugh today


17 posted on 04/04/2017 8:38:15 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

why would you use such an offensive term for Laura Ingraham?


18 posted on 04/04/2017 8:45:10 AM PDT by confederatecarpetbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Don’t you think the Russian stuff was all about the Establishment trying to stall Trump’s agenda, since both sides were going to be hurt by it? I don’t think it’s the media making excuses for getting the Election wrong. I don’t think anyone in the Establishment on either side believes that Trump only won because of Russia.


19 posted on 04/04/2017 8:49:53 AM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

I’ve met Laura and have called her show. She is staunchly pro-life, converted to Catholicism, and is an adoptive mother of three children. You are disgusting.


20 posted on 04/04/2017 8:50:11 AM PDT by doug from upland (Hey, traitor Democrats. I have a tree. I'm sure another FReeper has a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson