Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: confederatecarpetbag

There is so much here to answer.

1. Why Trump? How did you know Trump calls or calls from his advisors were already intercepted through incidental surveillance?

2. Why isn’t the President elect — for all intent and purposes not accorded the same privacy and diplomatic leeway as the Lame Duck? In other words, spying on the President elect is espionage. Espionage with a period.

3. A perfectly valid argument can be made that the lame duck term of a president from the election period to the inauguration is simply perfunctory and the real shots are called by the incoming administration in terms of Foreign Policy.

4. Where did she get info that Trump or Trumps advisors were John Doe in non FISA intercepts?


17 posted on 04/04/2017 9:34:41 AM PDT by Fhios (If Globalists want Globulism then what's the beef with Russia participating in a globalist election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fhios

Fhios, I think your 1st question is the most important. How and why did she know - or even suspect - that phone intercepts were taking place of the Trump team?


29 posted on 04/04/2017 9:47:56 AM PDT by confederatecarpetbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Fhios

5. How many other Presidential nominees since 2012 have had incidental surveillance? If you did it to Trump what about the other candidates?


38 posted on 04/04/2017 10:39:30 AM PDT by HOYA97 (twitter @hoya97)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson