Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATE: Susan Rice Confirms Her “Unmasking Requests” Were for President Obama
The Conservative Treehouse ^ | April 4, 2017 | Sundance

Posted on 04/04/2017 3:21:30 PM PDT by COUNTrecount

UPDATE: Susan Rice Confirms Her “Unmasking Requests” Were for President Obama’s Daily Briefing (PDB)…

With a general set of narrative ‘talking points’ in hand President Obama’s Former National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, appeared this morning on MSNBC for an interview with Andrea Mitchell. This is the ‘We-Have-To-Respond-phase‘, which necessitates the optic.

Andrea Mitchell is considered a trustworthy ally of the Clinton/Obama political networks; as such, it is not a surprise to see Mitchell selected as the interviewer. Mitchell’s use of wording carefully guides Susan Rice through the narrow path of self-incrimination by providing plausible deniability for verbal missteps.

You already know the routine. MSNBC is the favorable proprietary venue. Mitchell plays the role of media-legal-adviser, her client is Susan Rice. Live interviews are always the greatest risk (see: Evelyn Farkas) The full interview is below:

However, that said, there are some interesting aspects to the interview:

Susan Rice @00:51 – …”Let me explain how this works. I was a National Security Adviser, my job is to protect the American people and the security of our country. That’s the same as the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and CIA Director.; and every morning, to enable us to do that, we receive – from the intelligence community – a compilation of intelligence reports that the IC, the intelligence community, has selected for us –on a daily basis– to give us the best information as to what’s going on around the world.”

[Note, Susan Rice is describing the PDB]

“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.

And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess it’s significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”

OK, so right there, in the very beginning of the forward narrative, Susan Rice is confirming the “unmasking” request(s) which can be pinned upon her, are directly related to her need to understand -on behalf of President Obama- intelligence for the President’s Daily Briefing (the PDB). This was a previous question now answered.

This is EXPLOSIVE, and here’s why.

Remember, the President’s Daily Brief under President Obama went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration. Regarding the Obama PDB:

[…] But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.

In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.

By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deepstate; deepstategate; nationalsecurity; obama; pdb; rice; sundance; trump; trumpwasright; wiretapping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: Cboldt

ought to (but won’t) cause serious damage to Obama’s legacy.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ought to cause serious AND PERMANENT damage to the DemocRAT party.


61 posted on 04/05/2017 3:09:19 AM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (God, Guns, and Trump will save the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Zero Foreign Born should allowed to handle, see and read as you noted, “Such Sensitive Information”!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Wait a minute! Wouldn’t “Zero Foreign Born” disqualify ZERO???


62 posted on 04/05/2017 3:16:23 AM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (God, Guns, and Trump will save the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Bfl


63 posted on 04/05/2017 5:02:49 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortes fortuna juvat

It should have.

Obozo is living proof why our founders wanted no foreign born presidents.


64 posted on 04/05/2017 7:59:39 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The Democrat Party is the action arm of the Establishment Media. Thanks to Mark Twain for this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PIF

My dog left the jerk’s “legacy” on my neighbor’s lawn about 30 minutes ago.


65 posted on 04/06/2017 2:53:40 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson