Posted on 04/06/2017 9:22:45 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
President Donald Trump ridiculed former National Security Adviser Susan Rice after a televised interview with MSNBCs Andrea Mitchell.
Take a look at whats happening, Trump told the New York Times. I mean, first of all her performance was horrible yesterday on television even though she was interviewed by Hillary Clintons P.R. person, Andrea Mitchell.
Trump said he thought that the media was not covering the story enough, pointing to some Democratic friends of his who were disturbed by the civil liberties aspects of Rices behavior. The president did not share any new details, but encouraged the press to keep digging.
I dont want to comment on anything about other than to say I think its a I think its truly one of the big stories of our time, he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Ridicule is mans most potent weapon.
it IS one of the big - if not biggest - stories of our time. I hope the public prevails on the media to actually cover, to dig. Even Bob Woodward said this could be bigger than Watergate. He and Bernstein have spent the past four-plus decades protecting the sacred place of Watergate in the pantheon of scandals.
Hey Donald, you have something called an Attorney General, he can call for a Grand Jury or do al sorts of Bigly things.
I bet Andrea got so upset over that comment the Spackle was cracking on her face.
I love President Trump. He’s driving the progressives insane. So thankful he was elected!
Alinsky techniques from POTUS. He schlonged Andrea.
No it’s not “bigly”. “Bigly” was the MEDIA slur! Trump uses the term “big league”! Just as Dick Cheney says” “big time” not “big tie”! Stop parroting the media lies! The media lies about Trump all the way to what words he actually utters. The media cynically omits / distorts the actual term [ big league ] used by President Trump.
Not only is it a big story it is a big crime as well.
That’s why she never cackles, it’d crackle the spackle.
I say quit whining and put her in front of a grand jury.
Trump is doing fine despite you and a few others barking form the sidelines day and night, attempting to discredit the man. Some of you people are becoming inordinately obvious.
Obama Granted Hillary Access to Highly Classified Material While She Was Running for President
I love the dig at Andrea Mitchell.
She is such a DNC stooge.
Nunes Statement on Russia Investigation
Washington, April 6, 2017
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes today issued the following statement:
Several leftwing activist groups have filed accusations against me with the Office of Congressional Ethics. The charges are entirely false and politically motivated, and are being leveled just as the American people are beginning to learn the truth about the improper unmasking of the identities of U.S. citizens and other abuses of power. Despite the baselessness of the charges, I believe it is in the best interests of the House Intelligence Committee and the Congress for me to have Representative Mike Conaway, with assistance from Representatives Trey Gowdy and Tom Rooney, temporarily take charge of the Committees Russia investigation while the House Ethics Committee looks into this matter. I will continue to fulfill all my other responsibilities as Committee Chairman, and I am requesting to speak to the Ethics Committee at the earliest possible opportunity in order to expedite the dismissal of these false claims.
Stasi stasi stasi, little Obamanites, the narcissistic nose in the air.
It is past time to make their heads spin and pay the piper. I am sure many personally want that POS Rice in orange jumpsuit. That blithering idiot needs to be made to testify under oath. She will of course lie because she is an immoral person like most liberals and thus should go to prison. All this garbage is tied to Clinton and Obama. What are we going to do about it?....Probably nothing.
So was "deplorable." LOL.
It is exceptional to put the putative defendant in front of the grand jury. The grand jury gets the evidence and the prosecutor's argument that a crime was committed. The defendant can speak at trial if they want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.