With now seeking Assad to be removed we have the convergence with Obama’s foreign policy.
Appears so.
I think at some time in the future, with the colition that President Trump has built:
Neither Secretary Tillerson, nor President Trump, would be leaning forward on the position to remove Assad politically without that position being the recommendation of the aforementioned “Freedom Alliance“:
Fattah al-Sisi (Egypt), King Abdullah II (Jordan), Benjamin Netanyahu (Israel), Mahmoud Abbas (Palestinian Authority), King Salman and Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (Saudi Arabia).
Thinking in larger terms, the discussion about who to blame for the chemical attack, and the political removal of Bashir Assad are not mutually exclusive. Meaning, it is quite possible for President Trump and the U.S. team to understand it was NOT Assad who carried out the attack, and yet still use the appearance of Assad’s culpability (compromised position) to gain the political leverage for Assad to step down.
(Taken from the article)
From the article: “The process by which Assad would leave is something that I think requires and international community effort, both to first defeat ISIS within Syria, to stabilize the Syrian country to avoid further civil war, and then to work collectively with our partners around the world through a political process that would lead to Assad leaving.”
At least Tillerson’s comments are not WAR against ASSAD is on the way....
Tillerson & Trump would do well to investigate links between John McCain’s recent trip to Syria, his contacts with his CIA/ISIS friends, the history of ISIS using chemical weapons to stage false flag chemical attacks against civilians and this false flag chemical weapons attack on civilians.....