See if you can name the only politically correct Founding Father.
To: Academiadotorg
I don’t see how the government has the power to give charity to the needy. Especially when government puts a gun to MY head and takes MY money so that the government can provide “charity” in return for votes.
I prefer Davy Crockett’s speech: “Not Yours to Give”.
2 posted on
04/11/2017 9:48:18 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
To: Academiadotorg
They had a different definition of “national welfare” in those days.
To: Academiadotorg
Would like to see that quote sourced.
It has the tone of the period’s writing but some of the phraseology seems a bit off.
4 posted on
04/11/2017 9:53:24 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Academiadotorg
Check out the Towns of old. If you came to town and tried for handouts...they kicked you out.
To: Academiadotorg
Don't expect any Broadway shows to open any time soon with titles such as "Adams!," "Madison!," "Jefferson!" or "Washington!" That one was called 1776, and was a big success, too.
-PJ
8 posted on
04/11/2017 10:04:04 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: Academiadotorg
Hamilton was a tool of the central bankers Robert Morris and Guevenor Morris.
The father of debt driven government as well as the instigator of the Whiskey Rebellion.
9 posted on
04/11/2017 10:07:23 AM PDT by
Pietro
To: Academiadotorg
As a Jeffersonian, I am a skeptic as to Hamilton's comments, up to a point. But I will defend him, vigorously, on the suggested point in this thread. He has defined the general welfare in a way that excludes the particular welfare of special interest groups. The misapplication of the concept to include wealth redistribution from the producers to those being subsidized to not produce, is grossly illogical. For everything Hamilton says about it not being "local" obviously applies--and then some--for it not being a benefit to a particular class or faction.
For Jefferson's wise take on what we today describe as "Welfare," see Jefferson On Welfare.
I suspect that on this point, Jefferson & Hamilton would have agreed.
10 posted on
04/11/2017 10:13:11 AM PDT by
Ohioan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson