Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Three Presidents Born in 1946
Townhall.com ^ | April 14, 2017 | Michael Barone

Posted on 04/14/2017 1:10:53 PM PDT by Kaslin

With the inauguration of Donald Trump this year, we have now had, for the first time in our history, three American presidents who were born in the same year. There have been three pairs of presidents born in the same year -- the very dissimilar John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, in 1767; Richard Nixon and his surprise successor, Gerald Ford, in 1913; and Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush, in 1924.

Now we've had three presidents who were born in calendar year 1946: Bill Clinton (in August), George W. Bush (in July) and Donald Trump (in June). Note that all three were born just a little more than nine months after V-J Day. (For younger readers, that was the end of World War II.)

The U.S. Census Bureau considers 1946 to be the first year of the baby boom, a remarkable and unpredicted sudden surge in births in the United States and numerous other countries. It continued until 1964, which means Barack Obama, who was born in 1961, is also a part of the baby-boom generation.

The leading edge of the baby-boom generation, the oldest members of an enormous age cohort, has made its mark on American life. Growing up in an era of postwar conformity, they insisted on doing their own thing. They listened to and played rock 'n' roll, the first adolescent music genre. They participated in student riots. Their high-school class of 1964 had the highest test scores in history.

Compared with their parents, they attended college more and served in the military less. All seven presidents born between 1908 and 1924 were, in some form, in the military during World War II. Two of the 1946 presidents never were in the military at all, and one served in the Texas Air National Guard.

Two were the sons of men highly successful in quite different fields. One's father was a mysterious figure who died before he was born. But all three graduated from prestigious universities -- Georgetown University and Yale Law School, Yale University and Harvard Business School, and The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Of course, each was different. Bill Clinton was a political prodigy, with the capacity to understand public policy and its political implications seemingly off the top of his head. He started his political career early, running the 1972 George McGovern campaign in Texas and almost upsetting a Republican congressman in 1974. In 1976, he was elected Arkansas attorney general, and in 1979, at 32, he became the state's governor.

Clinton had luck, and with his dazzling political skills, he took advantage of it. When his career seemed to be winding down -- he was renominated and re-elected by lackluster margins in 1990 -- he took a chance on running for president against an incumbent who had started the year with 91 percent approval. That guaranteed weak Democratic competition, and Ross Perot's surprise candidacy, which dislodged George H.W. Bush, and surprise (and temporary) withdrawal boosted Clinton.

As president, Clinton had his stumbles and unique disgrace. He was disorganized and undisciplined, but he was also constantly adapting and revising, rewriting State of the Union addresses on his ride to the Capitol. The public mostly approved.

George W. Bush was, in some ways, the opposite. After an unsuccessful House race in 1978, he mostly laid aside politics. After his father lost to Clinton, he seems to have believed that God put him in the way of running for president, and he strove to tutor himself to do the best job possible.

His strength was steadfastness, his weakness (as always, a strength overdone) stubbornness. He was agonizingly slow on midcourse correction, notably on Iraq but also on Social Security reform.

Bush's political strategy, designed to keep Texas from being the next California, worked, but it gave him only small electoral vote majorities. When his job approval dropped, between 2006 and 2008, his party took the worst thumpings it'd had in 25 years.

Donald Trump's strategy followed not George W. Bush's but Ross Perot's. He bet that his trademark stands on trade and immigration (different from every president's since Dwight Eisenhower) -- though costing him votes of college graduates in California, Arizona, Texas and Georgia -- would gain him enough votes from non-college-educated people to win.

The bet paid off. Trump did worse than George W. Bush had done in those states, but it cost him zero electoral votes. Swings by non-college-educated whites in Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa and Maine gave him 100 electoral votes twice won by Barack Obama.

Was that shrewd insight or blind luck? Either way, it perhaps owed something to Perot (born in 1930), who helped make each of these boomers president.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1946; birthdays; bush43; presidents; trump45; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Mears
These also aren't very PC

Dig You Later--Perry Como (1946)
"It was mighty smoky over Tokyo"

When the Atom Bomb Fell--Karl & Harty (1945)
"Smoke and fire, it did flow through the land of Tokyo"

21 posted on 04/14/2017 6:38:24 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

My God,Perry Como even sang about it-——I don’t remember that one.

I was almost 14 when the atom bombs were dropped-——we kids cheered and marched in the streets of our Boston neighborhood when it happened.

In retrospect,that seems dreadful,but we knew that the war would be over.

.


22 posted on 04/14/2017 6:48:03 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Perhaps the ones cheering the loudest were our POW’s and civilian internees held by the Japanese. The bomb saved their lives.


23 posted on 04/14/2017 6:53:10 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
Thx, but it's the math I don't quite get. 1946 begins the "War Baby Boom", of returning soldiers, right? So they must count that surge of war babies delivering another surge of babies, therefore dragging​ it out to 1964. Bark is no original WW II war baby, but an offspring of one. That's the best I can do. Thx, Nifster.
24 posted on 04/14/2017 7:58:03 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Acad emi are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Their high-school class of 1964 had the highest test scores in history.”

Not a heck of a lot of “new methods” at that time.

But ever since they started with new methods, which were supposed to be better, things have worsened.

Entitlements begot snowflakes who suffer from all sorts of victimology, resentments, and need safe spaces, protected from micro-aggressions.


25 posted on 04/14/2017 8:01:19 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

It is a generational name...they set the generation at about twenty years because that is about the time one generation begins to have another


26 posted on 04/14/2017 8:16:54 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
Ah. I was getting warm, but I see now. Thanks! (Just trying to dump Bark on the curb and out of my generation..) 🐸
27 posted on 04/14/2017 8:29:07 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Acad emi are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Well we can do that because we are not only his elders but we are also his betters


28 posted on 04/14/2017 8:40:04 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

I hope the bent one buys it first


29 posted on 04/14/2017 8:57:15 PM PDT by Archie Bunker on steroids
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Professional

He is a vegan. Some vegans look fantastic, most look thin and seem washed out. My children and grandchildren are vegans. Not enough protein, is that look.


30 posted on 04/15/2017 6:14:31 AM PDT by thirst4truth (America, What difference does it make?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
Interesting post. Don’t quite follow the defined period that makes Bark a Baby Boomer

You have not heard those years 46-64 are the baby boomers years? Books and self help classes in the thousands have been written and taught about the boomers, their personalities, their accomplishments, how to deal with them in business or sales.

Now all we hear about are the millennial's, I think it is from 1982 to now? Recently, my son of 36 born in 1981, told me is he sick of millennial's, being dumb and selfish and doesn't want to have anything to do with them. I laughed, "you are a millennial", he said not I am not I missed it by one year. Well, he is married to one, and has two for siblings.

31 posted on 04/15/2017 6:23:27 AM PDT by thirst4truth (America, What difference does it make?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego; Responsibility2nd

“George W. Bush was, in some ways, the opposite. After an unsuccessful House race in 1978, he mostly laid aside politics. After his father lost to Clinton, he seems to have believed that God put him in the way of running for president, and he strove to tutor himself to do the best job possible.”


Barone is saying that George W. Bush decided to get into politics in order to avenge his father’s 1992 election loss, so had Perot not run (and thus GHW Bush not lost to Clinton) George W. Bush wouldn’t have run for president. Ergo, Perot’s 1992 run was a sine qua non for the Heorge W. Bush presidency coming about.

I would add something that Barone didn’t mention: Perot’s 1992 and 1996 runs made third-party presidential runs fashionable, and without Perot’s success I don’t think that Ralph Nader would have gotten so much press (or grass-roots support) in 2000. Had Nader not gotten 97,000 votes in FL, George W. Bush would not have been elected president. So there’s that as well.


32 posted on 04/15/2017 7:21:58 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

I think W’s greatest feature was the 8 great years he had as Texas governor. Then when he did run for president with the support of the Republican establishment he did very well.

But I like your point about Nader.


33 posted on 04/15/2017 9:25:26 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1; Professional

AIDS


34 posted on 04/15/2017 9:49:31 AM PDT by Impy (End the kritarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Arthur Wildfire! March; Bender2; campaignPete R-CT
With the inauguration of Donald Trump this year, we have now had, for the first time in our history, three American presidents who were born in the same year. There have been three pairs of presidents born in the same year -- the very dissimilar John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, in 1767; Richard Nixon and his surprise successor, Gerald Ford, in 1913; and Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush, in 1924.

Now we've had three presidents who were born in calendar year 1946: Bill Clinton (in August), George W. Bush (in July) and Donald Trump (in June). Note that all three were born just a little more than nine months after V-J Day. (For younger readers, that was the end of World War II.)

35 posted on 04/15/2017 9:51:53 AM PDT by Impy (End the kritarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thirst4truth

You’re right. I heard, but had not listened. I thought I was a “war baby”. Instead, I learn now, I’m a first year “Boomer”.
Bummer.

Not certain WTH the formula is for all these sociologists going around naming generations. Ha!


36 posted on 04/15/2017 12:47:25 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Acad emi are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson