Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The moab bomb costs $170,000 each not $16 million
Business insider ^ | 4/14/2017 | Alex Lockie

Posted on 04/15/2017 3:45:28 AM PDT by hotdogjones

The US's Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb does not cost $314 million, or $16 million, but $170,000 a unit, the US Air Force told Business Insider on Friday. The weapon, whose acronym inspired the nickname "Mother of All Bombs," was produced by the Air Force, not by a third party like Lockheed or Boeing, "so we don't have a standard procurement cost associated with them," an Air Force official said. The $170,000 figure makes sense considering a general-purpose 1,000-pound MK-83 costs about $12,000. The MOAB simply features more high explosives and larger fins to direct the GPS-guided munition. Many outlets, including The New York Times and Business Insider, inaccurately stated the cost of the MOAB as being in the millions. Business Insider's article has since been corrected to reflect this information.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bomb; defensespending; isis; military; moab; pricetag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2017 3:45:28 AM PDT by hotdogjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

It’s a good bang for the buck


2 posted on 04/15/2017 3:50:39 AM PDT by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

$170,000 is an amazingly small sum compared to 0bamas bill! 0 spent 10x’s that for a few Isis cuts and bruises.


3 posted on 04/15/2017 3:52:31 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

!. MAKE SOME MORE!! MAKE SOME MORE!! PLEEEEEZ!!!

2. It is interesting, that those ‘directional fins’ are the same as the ones used by the SpaceX renewable first-stage rockets.

3. The differences between $12,000.00 and $170,000.00 are that the 1000 lb. ‘dumb bombs’ are produced under contract, and in large quantities, so ‘they are cheaper by the gross’, where the ‘MOAB’ employs a military-grade GPS system, (unlike the one in your SUV that directs you into the gully), as well as a higher grade and amount of explosives.


4 posted on 04/15/2017 3:55:48 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

Compared to the value of a fully trained, experienced 18B, $16 million sounds cheap and $170K sounds trivial. I wonder what the De Alencar family would say?


5 posted on 04/15/2017 4:05:06 AM PDT by InABunkerUnderSF (Proudly deplorable since 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

Recent story here on FR said an AF spokesman claimed there is no way to calculate cost since it was (except for guidance package) built completely “in house.

The guidance package cost about $3500 and the explosive were really cheap bringing the material cost of the bomb to “about” $20,000 or possibly a bit more.


6 posted on 04/15/2017 4:06:49 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

Usual and customary FAKE NEWS from the NYSLIMES, the paper not fit to be used in an outhouse.


7 posted on 04/15/2017 4:11:39 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

Jeez, should have used that on the airbase instead of all those tomahawks.


8 posted on 04/15/2017 4:13:07 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

I’m guessing that is a per unit replacement cost and does not account for R&D.


9 posted on 04/15/2017 4:17:31 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

MOAB is a big f’n IED.


10 posted on 04/15/2017 4:20:01 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

Nonsense.

$5 per pound? The explosives cost more than that. A lot more.


11 posted on 04/15/2017 4:23:07 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

Here’s what the Guardian wrote:

Apr 14, 2017 · Each Moab, or massive ordinance air blast – nicknamed the “mother of all bombs” – costs $16m (£13m) out of a total programme cost of $314m.

Since its days as a Trotskyite rag the Guardian has been an untrustworthy news source.


12 posted on 04/15/2017 4:24:15 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Would that go into the R&D for the twenty ton bomb developed during WWII, an example of which was once located at Aberdeen Proving Ground (and now at Fort Lee?)? I believe an economist would consider the bomb, once produced, a sunk cost. Its value in inventory is nil. Its value on the battlefield is incalculable.


13 posted on 04/15/2017 4:28:08 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

The bomb is so big it has to be dropped out the back of a big, slow, very vulnerable cargo transport aircraft. It doesn’t fit in any bomber we have. Therefore it can only be deployed in areas where we have complete air supremacy and no active ground anti-air systems above MANPADs (Stingers or the like).

We don’t have that in Syria.


14 posted on 04/15/2017 4:29:12 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Yep.....that’d be my guess too. The other numbers are probably costs for various stages of design, development, integration with guidance and test.


15 posted on 04/15/2017 4:33:40 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GoldenPup

Are you disputing the cost of $170,000 vs. the prior reporting of $16 million?


16 posted on 04/15/2017 4:33:59 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Deportation mayhem is just birthing pains for a new America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

If you go back and look at the history of it, the statement “entirely in-house” is misleading. There were more than one contract let subcontractors for all the stages of design, development, integration with guidance and test. I know Dynetics, Inc. is one of them.


17 posted on 04/15/2017 4:35:30 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hotdogjones

Now all we need is to make them stealthy and covert them to cruise missiles on the cheap. Imagine having thousands of those at the ready for our next conflict.


18 posted on 04/15/2017 4:41:06 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf
As in the British WWII era Tallboy, followed by the Grand Slam. bombs.
19 posted on 04/15/2017 4:41:31 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith

I think the MOABs are fuel/air bombs. When they get to the target they first disperse a gas over a large area (I think with a small bursting charge) and then ignite the large cloud of highly volatile gas.


20 posted on 04/15/2017 4:43:18 AM PDT by nhbob1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson