My problem with this is that there must be some that are erroneous. And one of the problems with establishing so many they are looking into is that the fine line of who makes the call as to if it was or wasn’t, can make a difference in the life of an innocent person, like destroy it.
For me to say they all are true without investigation, is idiotic. But for me to say they aren’t is the same. Either way, there is no way with the history in these that it won’t go public. And being vindicated is not going to help the innocent person as just by being “investigated,” they have been damned by everyone that reads the story and automatically creates a mindset that will probably not go away. And this includes the school systems, their administrators, and parents of other students in the school.
They never should have released that the investigations were in progress. They’re probably going to harm someone that is innocent. And they took a chance with someone else’s life and not theirs. Just to sell a story. And no, the public doesn’t have a need to know on speculation. That old adage is manure.
red
In most of the cases these days, there is electronic evidence - usually 'deleted' texts and pictures, less frequently emails.
No sane DA will take a case to trial without some real evidence.