They had him on tape.
They had him on tape.
—
How do you know?
They had him on tape.
and most likely phone records probably corroborated the calls to their cellular phones.
None of us know what happened here, but objectively there were signs of smoke and he and Fox had the opportunity to fight it. They chose not to and that opened the door for more just as the old man predicted.
The irony for me is listening to the faux outrage from the left about how women need to be protected from men of power. Where were these same persons when the President of the United States was sticking cigars in a young intern inside the Oval Office?
Gold diggers.
What “tape” did they have him om? Link?
Sexual harassment in the form of “you look great in that dress” or calling a black girl “hot chocolate” and then “leering” at her is anything but, especially without witnesses.
Sexual harassment is saying “lets get it on” or worse. It is something blatantly and overtly sexual usually involving actually touching. At least it used to be.
In my view any woman who accuses a man of harassment had better have real PROOF or else they should be swiftly and ruinously sued for damages.
What was on the tape?...just wondering
BOR’s producer finally taped him phone stalking her. Otherwise he wouldn’t have paid $9 million to settle. Billy has not embraced the concept that sometimes no really means no.
From an old case 13 years ago.
“They had him on tape.”
*******************************
Really? Do you have a link to support that claim or do you just MAKE THIS STUFF UP AS YOU GO?
How much slutty flirting lead up to those tapes? O’Reilly would have been destroyed long ago if he made a practice of talking dirty early to women around work.
Was it tape rape?
What could he possibly have said on tape hurtful words?
Perhaps he threaten to withhold job benefits without inappropriate services? We really don’t know, but in no case was it necessary to fire their #1 cable news star.
You don’t shoot yourself in the foot until you first take basic measures to resolve the situation.
In the case of abuse of power you simply remove the power if the man wont reframe himself.
In the case of ‘hurtful words’ you fire the little girls who can’t keep themselves from being hurt by mere words.
Professionals particularity in the news industry where verbal ‘harassment’ is expected the failure to have graduate kindergarten with the knowledge of the difference between words, and actual sticks, stones, is a disqualifying attribute.
I’m sorry but a reporter who can’t handle words their stock and trade without harming themselves is a threat to themselves and the industry.