Posted on 04/24/2017 6:45:24 PM PDT by TigerClaws
A top New York Times editor decided the paper shouldnt use the term female genital mutilation because the phrase is too culturally loaded and widens a divide between the Western world and people who follow the rite.
Health and Science editor Celia Dugger said she came to the conclusion to refer to the act of removing the female genitalia of young girls as genital cutting during a trip to Africa in the 1990s. She spoke about her decision in a Times mailbag article in response to a readers question.
I never minced words in describing exactly what form of cutting was involved, and there are many gradations of severity, and the terrible damage it did, and stayed away from the euphemistic circumcision, but chose to use the less culturally loaded term, genital cutting, Dugger wrote. Theres a gulf between the Western (and some African) advocates who campaign against the practice and the people who follow the rite, and I felt the language used widened that chasm.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I noticed yahoo this morning called it "female circumcision" - as if there is such a thing.
Genital mutilation was the proper designation. But to normalize it (and Islam) MSM has to resort to Orwellian tactics.
And the feminists complaining and marching about this... Nowhere to be found.
How frightening is this that it’s now acceptable to mutilate women? All are to be sacrificed on the altars of Islam and communism.
Just more sucking up to the evil of islam. Urine be upon them.
I noticed yahoo this morning called it “female circumcision” - as if there is such a thing.
Yahoo news is the sewer of the internet, IMO. Just total garbage.
So now it’s being given a name that signifies it’s desirable?
The NYT would like everyone to believe that if it wasn’t in the Times, it never happened.
The Left fancies itself to be the great big defender of women.
Then, when issues come up...
Female genital mutilation? Oh, isn’t that too harsh a term for it?
Islam’s treatment of women? Oh well, that’s their culture you know...
Single digit aged girl brides? Oh well, it is their belief this is okay...
Stoning women for being raped? Oh well, look, we can’t always agree with everything others do.
The Left, always there to mouth off, but never there when you truly need help desperately.
Perhaps I should alert Yahoo, that male circumcision does not put an end to sexual pleasure.
Poor folks don’t seem to know that...
The MSM is the Country’s greatest threat.
Where the hell are all the womens rights groups???
Where have they been through all this Muslim BS???
Why are they not shouting from the rooftops about this like they do about falsely claiming they only get 79% of the pay men get????
It seems that the 21% of dollars is much more important to them than women being molested and mutilated and regarded as less than human by Muslims....
Because the left believes no rights are derived from God, everything and everyone can be sacrificed. And I mean really sacrificed as in killed.
The term “culturally loaded” is culturally loaded. It implies that cultures other than our own are fragile and primitive by comparison.
“How frightening is this that its now acceptable to mutilate women? All are to be sacrificed on the altars of Islam and communism.”
Its more insidious than simply mutilating women. This act is done with the one and only expressed purpose that the woman will never enjoy sex so she will never have the desire to cheat on her husband. This is apparently ok with women who seemingly place 100% of their identity into their sexuality and demand the world pay for it to boot
It’s not a rite...it’s a health hazard.
Watch Ann Barnhardt’s discussion of it.....you will be appalled.
Get off your high horses, women cannot be priests in the Catholic Church. NYC needs to declare Sharia Law in the city limits.
I guess New York Slimes is against male circumcision, since that’s what genital mutilation will mean to many. I keep reading how the Slimes continuously attacks Israel, which this will end up doing.
Brought to you by the same folks who get their panties in a wad when a man talks about grabbing a woman’s “kitty”.
But doesn’t complaining that female genital mutilation is culturally loaded imply that only one culture participates in it, thus making the complainer racist?< / almost sarc>
Beheading is now an Arabic haircut.
A suicide bombing is a unplanned demolition.
Dropping gays from an eight story building is scientific proof of gravity.
Stoning is just limbering up the old throwing arm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.