Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Refugee Resettlement To Continue Being Funded Under Proposed Budget
Daily Caller ^ | May 1 2017 | Alex Pfeiffer

Posted on 05/02/2017 4:03:47 AM PDT by Whenifhow

The budget deal to keep the government funded through September agreed upon by congressional leaders would continue funding the refugee resettlement program.

An agreement on the omnibus budget was reached by leaders from both parties Sunday, as a government shutdown looms on Friday. The proposed spending agreement includes no money to construct the president’s border wall, and continues funding Planned Parenthood.

[….]

The bill would include a total of $3 billion towards migration and refugee assistance, which is roughly the same that was spent in Fiscal Year 2016. It would also include $50 million towards the emergency refugee and migration assistance fund, which is also the same amount spent in the previous fiscal year.

With President Trump’s executive orders temporarily blocking refugee resettlement held up in court, 12,397 refugees have been resettled during his presidency.***……..

The Obama administration set a goal in September of 110,000 refugees admitted in Fiscal Year 2017. A State Department official told The Daily Caller in early April that “this language represents a ceiling on refugee admissions – it is not a mandatory target.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3dchess; 8dchess; article5; budget; cuck; funding; genius; maga; newsheriff; omnibusbudget; refugeeresettlement; refugees; trumpbudget; trumpimmigration; trumpomnibusbudget; winning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: PghBaldy; brucedickinson

So says the newbie, here to demoralize.


They don’t call it the Surrender Party for nothing. Look at all the “patriots” giving up after 100 days of the Trump admin. Is it a wonder conservatives never win?


21 posted on 05/02/2017 5:08:03 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Much more that this damn thing did and didn’t do! Hearing some pubbie folks on the telly saying they’re not supporting it.


22 posted on 05/02/2017 5:15:10 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: Whenifhow

Trump has options-——I doubt if he’ll pass this by.


24 posted on 05/02/2017 5:18:30 AM PDT by Liz (Shutting down conservatives' free speech is a form of hate speech. samtheman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Because Paulie Ossoff likes leading the democrat party

None dare call it treason

I wish Trump would just veto this crap


25 posted on 05/02/2017 5:25:55 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: brucedickinson
RE:”this is all the art of the deal- 9 or 10-D chess. You just wait, that swamp is gonna be drained so fast your head will spin. Those are some bad hombres. Really bad. We’ll get a tweet any day now about the wall. 400’ tall she’ll be, and made of Italian marble. A sight to see”

HAHA, Its either ‘3D chess’ or it's ‘Trump's been rolled’.

Either way we are supposed to blame Ryan, not Trump.

But how many years and budgets he signs for?

26 posted on 05/02/2017 5:27:05 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Trump "Mexico will pay for the Wall! Mark my words")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

The question becomes: “How many people do you want living in the USA?”

Is 300 million too many?
Is 500 million too many?
Is a billion too many?

For those people who benefit from an increasing population, there is no upper limit.


27 posted on 05/02/2017 5:32:53 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Thanks for posting. Garrison is fantastic.


28 posted on 05/02/2017 5:41:25 AM PDT by poconopundit (FR: Self-Reliant Lovers of Liberty who can't stop Chattering)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

TRUMP NEEDS TO APPOINT GINGRICH AS PAUL RYAN BABYSITTER


29 posted on 05/02/2017 5:49:22 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF OBAMACARE REPEAL THAT IS WORSE THAN KEEPING IT ONE MORE DAY***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

“Trump has been rolled by the Republican leadership or Trump is a two-faced lying POS. WHICH IS IT?”

Given that we all pretty much agree that GOP leadership is packed with feckless cowardly inept quislings, the answer to your question is pretty clear. If he signs a budget bill that contains nothing with which the Dems could quarrel, you have your confirmtion.


30 posted on 05/02/2017 5:53:28 AM PDT by crusher (GREEN: Globaloney for the Gullible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Yeah, pretty sure he works for Chuck Schumer.


31 posted on 05/02/2017 6:27:29 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Vacate the chair! Ryan must go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run

...refuse provide $1 billion to build the wall to prevent terrorists sneeking in the back door, yet they provide $3 billion to bring them in the front door and to feed and house them.

(((
Perfect description. I am adding that to the comments I am preparing for when I call my Representative today. Thank you.


32 posted on 05/02/2017 6:29:40 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Vacate the chair! Ryan must go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Liz, help! Please tell me the name and number of this bill. I am putting together my remarks for when I call my Rep. I went to the house.gov site, but I can’t find the bill.

I will post my remarks here for others to copy after I have composed them.


33 posted on 05/02/2017 6:36:32 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Vacate the chair! Ryan must go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Is it H.J. Res. 99?


34 posted on 05/02/2017 6:48:01 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Vacate the chair! Ryan must go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
No more Republicans. EVER.


35 posted on 05/02/2017 6:48:20 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

OK. That’s the way they want it. I’m finished voting Republican. f*ck em.


36 posted on 05/02/2017 6:57:14 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Cleverly destroying leftist idols with great gusto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Trump needs to hand pick a bunch of people to run against democrats... then two years down the road he needs to hand pick groups to run against idiot Republicans.


37 posted on 05/02/2017 6:57:32 AM PDT by GOPJ (Inside every progressive is a totalitarian screaming to get out... - - Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Think back to the comment from the Princess about refugees

There's that. Then there's the private meeting with Planned Parenthood that didn't stay secret. Then there's her kids singing to the Chinese premier, her brand getting the OK in China, and now they aren't a currency manipulator. And no tariffs on imports from Mexico that would pay for the wall?

I'm not liking this. I hoped Trump would be sitting down and negotiating with the likes of the North Korean minister and Assad simultaneously with rebuilding our military. We didn't expect him to shift focus away from the ONLY priority for now....disintegrating ISIS.

I'm getting a lot of pushback from the "don't worry, be happy, what do you know about 3D Chess" crowd on FR. But I'll keep saying this: One major issue that affected voters thought-making process throughout the process was a disdain for political dynasties, for this election the Bushes and Clinton. Electing Trump was a repudiation of that aspect of the swamp. Bringing Jared and Ivanka into the Aquarium, and as shameless swamp things no less, is an unforced error. You better believe a "Trump Dynasty" issue will be used against them! And Ivanka? It's shameless and in the open that libs are using her to set daddy's agenda. Is she too stupid, too arrogant, or doesn't she care that she's being used by the nation-destroying globalist liberal elites?

(End of this rant. But I not going to stop expressing my unease. Perhaps the only thing that will bring Trump back to the Deplorable agenda is when support from us slips)

38 posted on 05/02/2017 7:00:02 AM PDT by grania (only a pawn in their game)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

I am continuing to vote R at the state level. This is so an Art V will be our favor.


39 posted on 05/02/2017 7:00:02 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

1. SHUT DOWN REFUGEE PROGRAM 2. FUND THE BORDERWALL..3 SSHUT DOWN PLANNED PARENTHOOD..4 REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMACARE.....5
GET RID OF SPEAKER RYAN


40 posted on 05/02/2017 7:01:20 AM PDT by rxtn41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson