You are correct. I’ve seen a number of posts stating the only solution is to vote in a 60 majority in the Senate. While I admire their perpetual optimism, now is the time to drain the swamp before it’s too late.
” ... the only solution is to vote in a 60 majority in the Senate.”
Even with sixty there would still be a handful of Yertle RINOs who prefer “bi-partisanship”, so their excuse then would be “We need 75 seats.” So perhaps then they demand 100 seats.
As long as they don’t want to do what America voted for last November, they will always have excuses. It’s always something for cuckservatives and their sycophants here.
[You are correct. I’ve seen a number of posts stating the only solution is to vote in a 60 majority in the Senate. While I admire their perpetual optimism, now is the time to drain the swamp before it’s too late.]
“We have the House, we need the Senate”
“We have the Senate, we need the Presidency”
“We have the Presidency, but we need a filibuster-proof majority”
Future meme:
“We have the filibuster-proof majority but our corporate donors call the shots”