The vast majority of male circumcisions are done w/o religious context, in such a way as not to destroy sexual sensation, potency or fertility, and are notionally justified (in health terms) as a hygienic/protective measure. Male circumcision is not maiming, no more than pierced earlobes for earrings could be called "maiming."
Yes, and since we don’t run around naked in the jungle anymore, us modern society dwellers don’t need that “extra layer of protection”. It actually becomes a hazard as a bacteria trap instead. There are absolutely no benefits to the female variety, if you can call it that, except to denigrate women. Why are liberals silent about it? It shows their complicity.