Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In the House, some GOP members bow to media's pre-existing conditions scam
Press of Atlantic City ^ | 05/04/2017 | Betsy McCaughey

Posted on 05/04/2017 7:42:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 05/04/2017 7:42:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Still afraid of the media.

Apparently they’ve learned nothing from watching Trump.


2 posted on 05/04/2017 7:47:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
In Texas, a High Risk Pool was set up after HAPPA was passed in 1996. This was apparently outlawed by ObamaCare. Why hasn't it been reported that ObamaCare dismantled the State run High Risk Pools that existed prior to its enactment?
3 posted on 05/04/2017 7:54:32 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Apparently they’ve learned nothing from watching Trump.

And they never will. The cowardice is in their DNA. I wish we would primary every one of them and have Trump enthusiastically support their opponent. It's a pipe dream, but I'm allowed to dream.

4 posted on 05/04/2017 7:55:27 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The remaining 4 percent — those with pre-existing conditions...

Betsy's going to lose all credibility with this kind of claim.

The estimates I've seen range from 25% to 50%.

If it really was 4% she would be right -it wouldn't be an issue - but it clearly is an issue and it clearly impacts more people than she admits.

5 posted on 05/04/2017 7:57:02 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

The cowardice is in their DNA.


They are not cowards. Take away their obamacare exemption and watch how hard they fight. In reality they are self interested careerist pigs always taking the path of least resistance.


6 posted on 05/04/2017 7:58:06 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

RE: The estimates I’ve seen range from 25% to 50%.

Can you cite for us, a reliable source?


7 posted on 05/04/2017 8:01:48 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The solution is so easy. Mandate insurance companies to offer for a couple years only, a pricy Pre Existing Conditions Policy. Inform the country that insurance companies will not be forced to do this for more than two years. Thereafter, if you don't have insurance, you're screwed re ever getting it once you become sick.
8 posted on 05/04/2017 8:02:54 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Our leaders, in their usual timidity, have been afraid to boldly speak up and point out that, rationally, healthcare cannot be a “right”. I have noted for decades that this would ultimately lead to problems. I recently read a quote: “All great power has to do to destroy itself is to continue to attempt the impossible.” Stephen Vizinczey.

I remember decades ago as a hospital orderly watching a 16 year old girl die from renal failure and it was only a year or so later dialysis became possible. What a miracle, right? But it cost $25,000 a year in 1975 dollars to do, per person. Gummint, that great provider of all things good could not sit by and watch only the wealthy survive this “roll of the dice” catastrophe and so instead of declaring healthcare a right, outright, our courageous politicians decided to do the easy thing and just fund it. I remember thinking at the time that this would cause repercussions down the line.

Here we are, now, 4 decades later and our courageous politicians (/s) have yet to weigh in on the question with authority and so, by default, have created the expectation in the population that “healthcare is a right” which to the rational mind is equivalent to an edict prohibiting the tide. Once again our politicians have decided to kick the can down the road and hide. How long can this go on? I suspect not much longer.


9 posted on 05/04/2017 8:13:46 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

As you can see from my prior post, I agree with Betsy about our politicians being cowards but for the exact opposite reason. And it really does not matter if it is 4% or 50%, once gummint starts “giving money away” literally every single one of us is going to have a “pre-existing condition”.


10 posted on 05/04/2017 8:18:49 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Can you cite for us, a reliable source?

Here's an HHS study that puts it between 23% and 51% based on the definition used.

And here's a Kaiser study putting it at 27%.

Regardless of the exact number 4% doesn't pass the snicker test.

11 posted on 05/04/2017 8:21:37 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sounds like those with pre-existing conditions are going to pay less than the rest of us. Guess I need to go find myself one…


12 posted on 05/04/2017 8:22:17 AM PDT by CottonBall (Thank you, Julian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
And it really does not matter if it is 4% or 50%...

It matters if you're trying to gauge the credibility of the author.

13 posted on 05/04/2017 8:24:13 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Next I want to wait and buy car and home insurance after my car or house have a pre existing condition, like an accident or fire. That would save a lot of money.


14 posted on 05/04/2017 8:28:18 AM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Counterproposal — complete repeal followed by all 300 million of us taking a simultaneous mass piss in the graves of those who voted for it, followed by conversion of their houses into museums about why tyranny never works. Do we have a deal?


15 posted on 05/04/2017 8:55:43 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

The 4% are people with preexisting conditions who are not already covered under other plans. For example, the percentage of FReepers with a such conditions is high but many of us get Medicare. Lotta people here also have jobs with insurance.


16 posted on 05/04/2017 9:21:42 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
But it cost $25,000 a year in 1975 dollars to do, per person.

That is what was charged not what it actually costs.

17 posted on 05/04/2017 10:07:41 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I sincerely doubt these politicians are cowed by the media.

More likely, their Wall Street sponsors want to keep Obamacare in place. Follow the money.


18 posted on 05/04/2017 10:15:06 AM PDT by Bratch ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

I think that was the cost initially which was why it was so important for the politicians to step in and cover it before the media could turn it into a freak show/circus to manipulate the electorate. Which they did pretty quickly.

Granted, back then, a politician who advocated letting the poor die from renal failure when the wealthy did not would have been suicidal. But no effort to get in front of this all has ever been made and so those politicians became hostage to the media pointing out that leukemia, breast cancer, AIDS, you name it was unfair and these victims had to be taken care of as well. Once the voters pry open the door to the Treasury there doesn’t seem to be any way to push them out again.


19 posted on 05/04/2017 10:18:31 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
I think that was the cost initially which was why it was so important for the politicians to step in

Health care cost bear no relationship to the people's ability to pay.

I am old enough to remember when families sobbed at the door to get an injured child into a hospital, no cash or insurance no care, it was just the way it was.

I remember giving my father shots of veterinary antibiotics for an infection that wouldn't heal. Fixed him up fine but a sad commentary on the times.

20 posted on 05/04/2017 10:46:10 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson