Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The American Confederacy Is Still Alive In A Small Brazilian City Called Americana
Business Insider ^ | 5-7-2017 | Melia Robinson

Posted on 05/07/2017 11:21:23 AM PDT by blam

When the American Confederacy lost the Civil War in May 1865, 10,000 Southerners fled the US for a small city in Brazil, where they could rebuild their lives and carry on their traditions.

Now, 150 years later, their story has been seemingly erased from the history books.

But deep in the heart of Brazil, descendants of these confederate expats gather annually to celebrate their controversial history and maintain their traditions and culture. In 2015, Vice's Mimi Dwyer attended the festival and revealed what life is like in the city called Americana.

Each year, the small Brazilian city of Americana throws a huge celebration to commemorate the 10,000 Confederates who fled the American South after their side lost the Civil War.

(snip)

Today, their descendants look upon the Confederate flag not as an emblem of racism and slavery but as a symbol of something their ancestors held dear to their hearts.

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americana; brazil; confederacy; confederate; dixie; rebels; south
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: blam

Fleeing NAZIs went to Brazil and other South American countries also.


21 posted on 05/07/2017 11:54:55 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

I wonder if there really is such a thing as a French right winger and, if they exist, have the common sense to get out of Dodge!


22 posted on 05/07/2017 11:56:29 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bob

Sorry - my comment was aimed at the author of this article who was suggesting that the history of the Confederados was being deliberately obliterated. I would agree that leftists of various stripe are attempting to “whitewash” the new south of references to the Civil War.


23 posted on 05/07/2017 11:58:53 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Sorry, I misunderstood your point. Thanks for clarifying.


24 posted on 05/07/2017 12:02:42 PM PDT by Bob (Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Nazis went to almost every country in South America.


25 posted on 05/07/2017 12:04:10 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives.have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

There is also a colony of Welsh in Patagonia, several generations old.


26 posted on 05/07/2017 12:23:31 PM PDT by waterhill (I Shall Remain, in spite of __________.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

We should move all the monuments there.


27 posted on 05/07/2017 12:25:12 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: laplata

In almost every discussion or talk of the Confederacy, the issue of slavery is utmost...

Slavery was a small part of the cause of the Civil War and the formation of the Confederate States...

It accepts the shallow but unchallenged premise that the Civil War occurred because slavery was practiced in the South, and that righteous resolve to abolish the institution left the U.S. with no option other than a resort to arms. This is a myopic view
with which many historical facts simply cannot be reconciled.

The war resulted from causes unrelated to slavery and abolition. It was entirely a consequence of the Southern states’ secession, which occurred despite the undeniable fact that the slave states could not have hoped for better protection of slavery than that afforded by the U. S. Constitution — provided they remained in the Union.

Both Lincoln and the slaveholders well knew in 1860 that a constitutional amendment ending slavery would never be mathematically feasible. But Lincoln further understood that the South was gravitating toward secession as the remedy for a different grievance altogether: The egregiously inequitable effects of a U. S. protective tariff that provided 90 percent of federal revenue.

Foreign governments retaliated for it with tariffs of their own, and payment of those overseas levies represented the cost to Americans of their U. S. government. Southerners were generating two-thirds of U. S. exports, and also bearing two-thirds of the retaliatory tariffs abroad.

The result was that that the 18.5 percent of America’s citizens who lived in the South were saddled with three times their proportionate share of the federal government’s costs.


28 posted on 05/07/2017 12:26:31 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Why??? The monuments shouldn’t even be touched...They are a part of history whether some like it or not....

Destroying or removing monuments are just another act of “political correctness”...


29 posted on 05/07/2017 12:29:30 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949
Foreign governments retaliated for it with tariffs of their own, and payment of those overseas levies represented the cost to Americans of their U. S. government. Southerners were generating two-thirds of U. S. exports, and also bearing two-thirds of the retaliatory tariffs abroad.

What was the tariff rate on raw cotton imports in Britain and France prior to the war? Just curious.

30 posted on 05/07/2017 12:36:36 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Why??? The monuments shouldn’t even be touched...They are a part of history whether some like it or not....

Destroying or removing monuments are just another act of “political correctness”...


31 posted on 05/07/2017 12:38:51 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All

oops...Sorry for the repost....


32 posted on 05/07/2017 12:40:15 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

The south thought that because of Europe’s reliance on the south for cotton, the seccession would be economically good for the southern states...


33 posted on 05/07/2017 12:45:23 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949
The south thought that because of Europe’s reliance on the south for cotton, the seccession would be economically good for the southern states...

Well they really blew that one then, didn't they?

34 posted on 05/07/2017 12:54:32 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Yep...Sure did....


35 posted on 05/07/2017 12:58:08 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: blam

Yeah Germans went there after WWII too


36 posted on 05/07/2017 1:00:33 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Half of the Brazilian population of 200 million self identify as Black.

Doesn't really affect a place like Americana. About 100 percent of those 100 million blacks live in the north of Brazil. Americana is in the southern part of Brazil, which is about 100 percent European.

I only found this out recently.

37 posted on 05/07/2017 1:04:55 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blam

>>>Georgian. God bless them for not bowing to political correctness.


38 posted on 05/07/2017 1:24:30 PM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vesparado

Their small numbers vs the Brazilian government caused them to see the light. Slavery in Brazil was outlawed in the 1880s.


39 posted on 05/07/2017 1:26:16 PM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Make no mistake about it, they are trying to erase that from the history of America.
Statues are being removed, flags are being banned.


40 posted on 05/07/2017 1:39:17 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson