Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comey misstated key Clinton email evidence at hearing, say people close to investigation
Washington Post ^ | May 9, 2017 | By Devlin Barrett

Posted on 05/09/2017 7:56:02 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

FBI Director James B. Comey overstated key findings involving the Hillary Clinton email investigation during testimony to Congress last week, according to people close to the inquiry.

In defending the probe, Comey offered seemingly new details to underscore the seriousness of the situation FBI agents faced last fall when they discovered thousands of Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s emails on the computer of her husband, Anthony Weiner.

“Somehow, her emails were being forwarded to Anthony Weiner, including classified information,” Comey said, adding later, “His then-spouse Huma Abedin appears to have had a regular practice of forwarding emails to him for him I think to print out for her so she could then deliver them to the secretary of state.”

At another point in the testimony, Comey said Abedin “forwarded hundreds and thousands of emails, some of which contain classified information.’’

Neither of those statements is accurate, said people close to the investigation. The inquiry found that Abedin did occasionally forward emails to her husband for printing, but it was a far smaller number than Comey described, and it wasn’t a “regular practice,” these people said. None of the forwarded emails were marked classified, but a small number — a handful, one person said — contained information that was later judged to contain classified information, these people said.

Justice Department and FBI officials are considering whether and how to clarify the misstatements, said people familiar with the matter.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: backupthetruck; clintonscandals; come; comey; cya; dncleaks; dnctalkingpoints; emailgate; fbi; flipflopping; hillaryemails; hillarysemails; humaemails; mediaspin; nationalsecruitu; pravdamedia; weiner; weinergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Drain the swamp.
1 posted on 05/09/2017 7:56:02 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Reject story until they unmask the source. They make it sound like FBI agents when it is likely Hillary’s lawyer.


2 posted on 05/09/2017 7:58:58 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Just need one for felony conviction. Laws don’t apply to Dems.


3 posted on 05/09/2017 7:59:47 AM PDT by petercooper (Ryan and McConnell need to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s that old problem with lying....you have to tell another and another and another..


4 posted on 05/09/2017 8:00:05 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Forwarding even 1 email to the perv is one too many.


5 posted on 05/09/2017 8:00:07 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Perhaps “these people” should be subpoenaed to present all these statements under oath.


6 posted on 05/09/2017 8:00:12 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Nobody thunk to aks Comey for evidence?


7 posted on 05/09/2017 8:01:04 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

The problem is Comey. Don’t u all get it?


8 posted on 05/09/2017 8:01:42 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
All a lot about nothing. Huma sent the emails either through SMTP or her backup program. She directed them there in any event.

At this point what difference does it make.

9 posted on 05/09/2017 8:02:00 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What a load of horse crap.

The fact that she had this server set up to try to dodge FOIA requests is enough.

She knew damn well what she was doing.

These people can rot in Hell.


10 posted on 05/09/2017 8:02:09 AM PDT by rlmorel (President Donald J. Trump ... Making Liberal Heads Explode, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The FACTS are that the FBI did NOT investigate DNC
computers but took all of this on the hearsay of
Clinton and her operatives.

Winners: The Comey Brothers.

Loser: US Constitution and Law.


11 posted on 05/09/2017 8:02:31 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This article basically says the opposite of the title. Comey was right in what he said, but the article is arguing that the degree and volume were not accurate. This is an attempt by pro hillary/abedin/etc. to lessen the impact of these obvious criminal acts so charges are not brought up or recommended.


12 posted on 05/09/2017 8:03:42 AM PDT by Duke of Milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The inquiry found that Abedin did occasionally forward emails to her husband for printing [...]

Because lots of people who work for the Federal Government would rather print out their important e-mails at home, on their antediluvian dot matrix printer, rather than on their super-modern govt. color printer.

I mean: Right?

Although: Isn't it usually the other way around?

Regards,

13 posted on 05/09/2017 8:08:53 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“later judged to contained classified information”

Whenever you see this phrasing you know it’s an attempt to blow smoke.


14 posted on 05/09/2017 8:10:21 AM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Stated like that, it seems rather innocuous.

However, according to others who are experts on the security of classified information, it would have to be physically removed from the secure location and moved to a non-secure computer to be 'forwarded' to anyone. That would indicate that the person who removed the material from the secuire location KNEW they were removing CLASSIFIED material with the intent of distributing it via a non-secure computer.

People are serving prison terms for doing less. So, why are the FBI and DOJ stuck in the mud?




15 posted on 05/09/2017 8:10:58 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Duke of Milan

“Somehow, her emails were being forwarded to Anthony Weiner, including classified information,” Comey said, adding later, “His then-spouse Huma Abedin appears to have had a regular practice of forwarding emails to him for him I think to print out for her so she could then deliver them to the secretary of state.”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

if hildabeast needed hard copies, why didn’t huma just print them on the office printer?


16 posted on 05/09/2017 8:11:09 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Only the Clinton’s could get the media to go along with something as stupid as a document being “later found to be classified”

It is classified when it is created, or not.

Once it is released into the public, you can’t recall it and ‘classify’ the information- it’s already out.

As soon as I read that in this article I though that this must be a libtard journalists from a media rag, and I was right.


17 posted on 05/09/2017 8:13:10 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

BS

If it was only ONE classified document, that is still ILLEGAL!!!!!!!


18 posted on 05/09/2017 8:14:09 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I thought it was the NYPD who first talked about the number of emails on the laptop ?


19 posted on 05/09/2017 8:15:44 AM PDT by stylin19a (Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surrey
Forwarding one from an unsecured computer is the crime. Huma's computer only corroborates the whole fiasco.

It would be interesting to find that wikileaks actually came off Huma's "at home" computer.

20 posted on 05/09/2017 8:16:23 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson