To: rrrod
Why? If he tells them anything new besides what he previously stated, he would be perjuring himself. Since he is no longer employed, he no longer would have access to new information, thus his testimony would have to be the same as previous testimony.
6 posted on
05/10/2017 4:33:31 PM PDT by
PJBankard
To: PJBankard
Since he is no longer employed, he no longer would have access to new information, thus his testimony would have to be the same as previous testimony. Comey on the phone at LAX: "Get on the computer! Destroy those files! You understand??!"
Aide: "I can't!! The passwords have all been changed!"
14 posted on
05/10/2017 5:20:00 PM PDT by
COBOL2Java
("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
To: PJBankard
What did he know and when did he know it?
Why did Comey keep Andrew McCabe on staff, after learning about the cash-flow into Mrs. McCabe’s campaign.
The appearance of impropriety is all it takes.
15 posted on
05/10/2017 5:51:19 PM PDT by
ptsal
( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson