Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jjsheridan5
I have not read the actual nutritional label in question. But the labels in this thread list "sugars", not "added sugars".

See the link in my post #14. It clearly shows that for this particular product, there are added sugars now. It is the new label, likely as a result of the 2014 recommendation by the FDA (also noted in my post 14), and not the one given when she was using the product.

I still stand by the statement that she claims sugar was not shown, when it clearly is on the nutrition side, and her lawsuit does not distinguish between natural or processed sugar, but the fact that the label didn't say the product contained sugar. The nutrition side clearly states it does.

78 posted on 05/25/2017 12:04:12 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool - you bet that Tommy sees! - Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: IYAS9YAS
Sorry, not post 14. It's in post 26. Here's the link:

http://www.sportbeans.com/products/assorted_sport_beans.aspx

79 posted on 05/25/2017 12:05:52 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool - you bet that Tommy sees! - Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson