Posted on 05/25/2017 10:16:23 AM PDT by Fitzy_888
Video at link.
What the HELL is that supposed to mean?? WHY confuse us?
I thought that might be why Anthony Weiner took the fall and plead guilty - to get the evidence in the case (his laptop with all Hillary’s emails) returned or destroyed, before it becomes evidence in a new case.
And DWS is waaay deep in all of it. She is protecting these pukes
I didn’t watch the video...yet but will say that if that computer was in her office, it isn’t HERS. It’s Government Furnished Equipment or GFE and there are plenty of rules and handbooks oit lining the rules, etx. Unless she brought in a personal computer/laptop..but then she’d be in violation the same as Hillary..
Nothing confusing about it
Okay, please explain it in plain talk....makes no sense to me.
So DWS hires these people and they download all this information, surely some about her also, and now she thinks this computer is ‘her’ property??? WRONG...to bad Deb Downer, your done...there is amble information on there to take down the whole House of Cards, it relates into Seth Rich, and a lot of other things...
I hope it is leaked like the one in NYC of Weiners!!! Your all a bunch of crooks!!!
An attempt at humor muddled by the use of the word “sandscript” in place of the word Sanskrit.
The first guy is or was the IT guy for house democrats ...all sorts of emails went through DWS computers. That would include ones that Seth Rich supposedly leaked to Wiki.
You are aware Tich was murdered?
Following all this can be a bit confusing at times, I must admit.
Among many other things, the Arwan brother are said to be complicit in the info gathering schemes of the Hillary gang. Blabber mouth WassermanSchultz’ hired them(don’t need any clearance with the intern/staffer/etc method — see opensource investigator George Webb).
In the end, I think were starting to find it’s all connected. Nearly the same location in the swamp, anyhow. All team Clinton. Arkansas politics taken world wide.
That won’t happen. Prosecutors don’t seek indictments based on a promise of relinquishing evidentiary material back to a defendant. Weiner also would have little incentive, if any, to even consider such a quid pro quo.
I think most of us got the joke. Wish I had thought of “sandscript” first. I’m hereby appropriating it
“A federal employee with knowledge of the situation and who requested anonymity told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group that as House authorities closed in on Imran Awan and his brothers, a laptop used by Imran was hidden in an unused crevice of the Rayburn House Office Building. Wasserman Schultz’s office is in Longworth House Office Building, a separate structure.”
This is the laptop DWS now claims as personal equipment.
Where is the law? Get the computer before Clintons/DNC scrub it, if there is any law enforcement left in DC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“Prosecutors don’t seek indictments based on a promise of relinquishing evidentiary material back to a defendant.”
But after a case is closed, what happens to evidence/personal property? Especially when guilt is formally admitted, there is no further need of that evidence.
They may seek to encourage expedite the disposal or return of that property - especially if they have one or two party hacks on the inside, who just need a plausible excuse to cover for them destroying or returning Weiner’s laptop.
“Weiner also would have little incentive, if any, to even consider such a quid pro quo.”
Plata O Plomo (silver or lead), as the drug cartels say. Take the payoff (silver), or take a bullet (lead).
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
That woman (with apologies to women) belongs in prison. Why the morons in Florida keep voting for her is beyond reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.