Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Expedites Trump’s Petition on Executive Order Case
Breitbart ^
| June 3, 2017
| by Ken Klukowski
Posted on 06/03/2017 11:16:18 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: COUNTrecount
A winning smackdown is coming...
2
posted on
06/03/2017 11:17:09 AM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: 2banana
keep calm :)
I hope, but with SCOTUS you just never know.
To: COUNTrecount
“...final decision coming down in early or mid-2018.”
Wow, if that’s “expediting,” I’d hate to see what the slow road is.....
4
posted on
06/03/2017 11:22:18 AM PDT
by
AnalogReigns
(Real life is ANALOG...)
To: COUNTrecount
Obola is going to be so pissed he will send out thousands of #BlackLiesMatter Soros’ mercenaries to start their jihad.
5
posted on
06/03/2017 11:23:49 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Some people consider government to be a necessary evil, others their personal Ponzi scheme.)
To: AnalogReigns
Yeah that’s the SC schedule but I wonder if Roberts will sign a stay?
That’s the big question right now.
Is he compromised and it won’t happen?
6
posted on
06/03/2017 11:23:59 AM PDT
by
romanesq
(For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
To: COUNTrecount
SMACKDOWN IMMINENT:
The lower courts never even had jurisdiction.
This ONLY belonged in front of the SCOTUS.
7
posted on
06/03/2017 11:25:05 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: COUNTrecount
I hope the Judge rule on what the law says the President can legally do verses what words one has said........as they have been ruling on his words and that seems so out of bounds...
8
posted on
06/03/2017 11:25:26 AM PDT
by
blueyon
(The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
To: COUNTrecount
I had a feeling this would get fast tracked. :-)
9
posted on
06/03/2017 11:26:00 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: 2banana
We will see if the Constitution and the Rule of Law means anything with this Ruling.
Anything less than a Unanimous slap down of the Lower Courts will tell the tale.
10
posted on
06/03/2017 11:29:03 AM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(Islamiphobia is a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.” Christopher)
To: COUNTrecount
hopefully this is really good news.
To: AnalogReigns
No kidding. Slow-walk must = ‘when cars fly’.
12
posted on
06/03/2017 11:32:34 AM PDT
by
txhurl
(Time to blow the Queen and King off the board, DJT, and by your birthday, or on it!)
To: AnalogReigns
Wow, if thats expediting, Id hate to see what the slow road is..... That would be the normal schedule. The expedited schedule means a decision could happen by October. The excerpt above doesn't make it clear but it's in the article.
13
posted on
06/03/2017 11:33:45 AM PDT
by
SeeSharp
To: SeeSharp
Thanks for the clarification. :)
To: COUNTrecount
Sounds like it’s John (it’s a tax) Roberts decision whether to grant stay.
15
posted on
06/03/2017 11:37:22 AM PDT
by
rainee
(Her)
To: COUNTrecount
We always seem to be on the short end of the stick. Really would be surprised if this Country can survive with the slow action of life matters. America is so full of bull shi! government types that we cannot succeed. This is so important that the SC should take it up tomorrow, but instead these useless pieces of junk will let America hurt.
To: COUNTrecount
First litmus test for Gorsuch.
BTW, he just said at an event at Harward that he did NOT share a cynical view on government!!! Yikes!!!
He was joined by Stephen Breyer for that program.
It was also a little unsettling to see him being so jovial with Breyer and Sotomayor during the recent SCOTUS photo shoot.
17
posted on
06/03/2017 11:43:08 AM PDT
by
edie1960
To: Diogenesis
SMACKDOWN IMMINENT: The lower courts never even had jurisdiction.
This ONLY belonged in front of the SCOTUS.
As I understand it, there is a statute giving the President the authority to do what he did and at the same time denying the Supreme Court jurisdiction. The Constitution gives Congress the right to determine the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, so the plaintiff in this case has to argue that the President is doing something the Constitution doesn't allow Congress to authorize him to do. That's why they are making this crazy religious discrimination argument
18
posted on
06/03/2017 11:43:22 AM PDT
by
SeeSharp
To: COUNTrecount; All
Our Constitution does not apply for those not yet within our jurisdiction. POTUS ability to bar anyone from entering the USA is valid.
If any individual believes they are barred wrongfully, let THEM sue, or apply, for entrance to USA - SIMPLE.
19
posted on
06/03/2017 11:44:21 AM PDT
by
1_Of_We
To: edie1960
Ooops. Meant to spell Harvard. Sorry!
20
posted on
06/03/2017 11:45:38 AM PDT
by
edie1960
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson