Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

31,487 U.S. Scientists Reject Global Warming Hoax
Fairfax Free Citizen ^ | June 4, 2017 | Jonathon A Moseely

Posted on 06/04/2017 3:00:50 PM PDT by Moseley

A growing list of 31,487 U.S. scientists (and counting) has signed a petition strongly rejecting as unproven the hypothesis of man-made global warming or climate change. These signers include four NASA astronauts, at least two Nobel Prize winning physicists, 9,029 Ph.D.s and some of the nation’s top climatologists. Only U.S. scientists are included in this particular petition. Only relevant scientific fields are included.

The “Global Warming Petition Project” includes a dramatically strong statement to which 31,487 scientists have already signed their names:

"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 97; blogpimp; climate; consensus; fakescience; globalwarming; paris; scientists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
The hypothesis of man-made global warming is particularly controversial because there have never been any empirical experiments testing the effect of carbon dioxide in the open atmosphere. The hypothesis rests exclusively on computer models. Models are created by humans and merely reflect the assumptions and biases of the humans who create them. The only test of such models is whether they predict accurately future events. However, climate change models consistently fail to predict real-world temperatures. A real scientist would reject models that fail that acid test.

Although it is observed in the laboratory that CO2 absorbs and holds heat, how CO2 behaves in the open atmosphere in a planet-wide climactic system cannot be tested. One challenge is that atmospheric gases circulate freely. The air containing minor traces of CO2 can easily soar many miles up to high altitudes, where the thin air can radiate heat into outer space.

1 posted on 06/04/2017 3:00:50 PM PDT by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moseley
Back up links for those interested in the Global Warming Hoax:

http://710wor.iheart.com/onair/mark-simone-52176/watch-how-the-global-warming-scare-15883123/

http://www.kusi.com/story/14072205/global-warming

http://uscentrist.org/platform/positions/environment/context-environment/john_coleman/the-amazing-story-behind-the-global-warming-scam

2 posted on 06/04/2017 3:02:39 PM PDT by Chgogal (I will NOT submit, therefore, Jihadists hate me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Obama is gone and they have FREEDOM


3 posted on 06/04/2017 3:07:13 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Yet another good climate story today to bookmark.


4 posted on 06/04/2017 3:07:54 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

5 posted on 06/04/2017 3:08:58 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

It really puts things into perspective when you look at a pie chart graph and see that CO2 is only 0.04% of Earth’s atmosphere. Only four one-hundredths of one percent of the components. Miniscule. Not even a fart in a hurricane. No wonder they have to lie so much about it.


6 posted on 06/04/2017 3:12:02 PM PDT by Tucker39 (Known as the Father of modern agriculture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

I signed it.


7 posted on 06/04/2017 3:13:37 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

31,487 U.S. Scientists Reject Global Warming Hoax

And 587,422 Azzhole politicians and MSM believe the BS.
So what?


8 posted on 06/04/2017 3:14:50 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

also link to the CIA fabricated this in the 1950s.


9 posted on 06/04/2017 3:14:54 PM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Thanks so much for your support to this point... I personally apprecaite it...
FReepers, it's time to wrap up this FReep-a-thon.  Lets do it...


President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America

Ramirez political cartoon: Economic Climate Change LARGE VERSION
06/03/2017: LINK  LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).


Please join the monthlies, an automated and the best way to help support Free Republic.

If you are not opting to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  
LINK



FReepers, 84.26% of the Second Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.  Click above and pencil in your donation now.  Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!

...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

Just $654.00 to 85.00%

10 posted on 06/04/2017 3:16:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (May the Covfefe be with you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley; All
"Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."

Yup... it's called PHOTOSYNTHESIS.

You learn this in 8th grade science class.

11 posted on 06/04/2017 3:21:05 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

I guess that’s the 3%. Must mean 1,049,567 scientists believe in it (sarc)


12 posted on 06/04/2017 3:23:46 PM PDT by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim
I signed it.

Good on you! Any professional repercussions for doing so?

13 posted on 06/04/2017 3:23:59 PM PDT by broken_clock (Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

They are being slandered and fought tooth and nail by the horde of scientists and politicians receiving Big Payola for their ‘work’ to ‘eliminate’ Global Warming, a.k.a. ‘climate change.’

Money talks.


14 posted on 06/04/2017 3:24:11 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Also, don’t be tricked into believing that we have the burden of proving the absence of man-made global warming. Those who eould wreck our economy have the burden of proving — more than alleging — the need to act.


15 posted on 06/04/2017 3:26:41 PM PDT by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
I wish people who don't understand these things would not pontificate on them. The effect of CO2 on re-radiation from the earth to outer space is unarguable. That is not the point. The point is the response of the system to increased generation of CO2.

1. Does it lead to generally higher levels of CO2 or is the CO2 absorbed elsewhere in the system.

2. Is increased CO2 offset by decreases in other atmospheric constituents [water vapor, methane]?

etc.

16 posted on 06/04/2017 3:27:45 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_clock
Good on you! Any professional repercussions for doing so?

No... not really. I got a couple of crank emails at first. But, it died down. But then, I work in the Petrochemical industry... not in academia.

17 posted on 06/04/2017 3:28:32 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Moi aussi.


18 posted on 06/04/2017 3:31:01 PM PDT by Fungi (Mucor roxii is not a rock band.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

The founding father of Climate Research, one Hubert Lamb, began with a study on the Medieval Warm Period, MWP, a span of a few hundred years beginning in the late 800s and lasting to maybe 1200.

The Climate Science crew still has no agreed upon explanation for why the Medieval Warm Period occurred, just a number of possible causes.

Likewise they only have proposed causes for The Little Ice Age that followed it (1300 to early 1800s).

So if the Anthropogenic Global Warming true believers don’t know the cause of the MWP then how do they know that a similar process isn’t at work again?

The AGW people use language that sounds more like religion than it does science- “deniers”. When Einstein had a different theory than Newton or Kant was he a “denier”? Of course not. Are the String Theory people “relativity deniers”?

A different theory or opinion about the data or its accuracy isn’t the work of “deniers” in science- that’s something heresy hunters use in religion and politics to stifle dissent. And that’s dangerous.

Some of us are old enough to recall other politically motivated “science” hysterias- The Population Bomb being one of them. Another was the Limits-To-Growth claim that were going to run out of oil and other commodities. It’s instructive that these are movements of the Left, and when they fail to materialize they simply are ignored as if they never happened.


19 posted on 06/04/2017 3:45:58 PM PDT by Pelham (Liberate California. Deport Mexico Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

String Theory people view Relativity people as old hat! Now Super Symmetry people they’re the heretics! Standard model people are just to be pitied!


20 posted on 06/04/2017 3:50:39 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson