Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/05/2017 7:46:11 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GIdget2004

The author refers to “Trump”, but his
is President Trump.

American TRAITORS Fabian and Williams
should go back to al Qaeda.


2 posted on 06/05/2017 7:48:34 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

I doubt it. The SC either gives Trump back his right to protect the nation or they take responsibility for the defense of our nation. Tweets have nothing to do with it other than to remind the Supremes that people are trying to kill us and the courts are second guessing our efforts to stop it.


3 posted on 06/05/2017 7:49:11 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

No, not undercut. He’s arguing to larger audience and putting court on notice that the executive has a unique responsibility and it is not theirs to meddle. Wish he’d go a step further and explicitly state that if anyone over the past months kills an American then it is blood on the court’s hands because they stopped him from exercising his constitutional and legal authority. This is the case he is making to the American people and the court is smart enough to realize they don’t want to be holding the blame if someone comes in and kills an American. Comes in because of their court decision.


4 posted on 06/05/2017 7:49:21 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp is not party specific. Lyn' Ted is still a liar, Good riddance to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

But “the Police acted stupidly” was sacred text from the leftists’ god.

Cue the concern troll media.


5 posted on 06/05/2017 7:49:33 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
Let me get this straight.

Facts, legal arguments, and the constitution are set aside in favor of campaign rhetoric that liberals don't like. Cool, we really are in a new age.

6 posted on 06/05/2017 7:51:42 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (We live in interesting times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Trump needs to drag these people through the mud, publicly. When a terrorist attack does occur here, and the way we’re going, it will, he needs to publicly blame the black robed tyrants. The public needs to hear that it’s their fault their friends, family, and neighbors are dead at the hands of savages.


8 posted on 06/05/2017 7:55:09 AM PDT by JamesP81 (The DNC poses a greater threat to my liberty than terrorists, China, and Russia. Combined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

In then meantime, if we suffer a terrorist attack that this “moratorium” would have prevented, every judge who has ruled against it should face trial by military tribunal for treason, be convicted, and summarily executed.


10 posted on 06/05/2017 7:59:19 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Looks like we can abandon 1000+ page legislation and get rid of lawyers to write lengthy policy documents that agree with the Constitution. Just let lawmakers tweet and have the courts rule on tweets.

I’m all for greatly reducing the pages in legislation and policy but I’m not sure we want regulations of 142 characters or less. It may be best to keep some of the lawyers and have them write slightly longer regulations so that government employees can implement them in accordance with the Constitution.

But, if the legal documents don’t matter, we should definitely get rid of the lawyers who write them. Tweets are much closer to the idea of some of the founding fathers’ that laws should be understood by the common man.


12 posted on 06/05/2017 8:03:07 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

No, that Trump tweet is irrelevant to the issue. Either the President gets to conduct foreign policy, of which immigration is a component, or he doesn’t. The President gets to express his opinion about terrorism, and his opinion does not somehow magically abrogate his authority as duly elected President.


13 posted on 06/05/2017 8:10:52 AM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

The principal argument in this whole matter is that the Constitution is not a suicide pact.


15 posted on 06/05/2017 8:27:09 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

If the Supreme Court judges law through tweets then the country is farther gone than we had thought


16 posted on 06/05/2017 8:48:36 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Shove it, The Hill. And your stupid Obama spokeschild too. Trump can say what he wants. Nothing he says will meet your approval.


17 posted on 06/05/2017 8:52:00 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

What do the President’s Tweets have to do with the Law?

Buzzie Ginsburg disparaged President Trump before and after he was Elected.

Why is she even allowed to judge this Case since the Lower Courts used Candidate Trump’s comments to make up their Lawless Rulings against him?


18 posted on 06/05/2017 8:53:07 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Islamiphobia is a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.” Christopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

So, let me get this straight - someone’s tweets about a law can get a law thrown out.

Can we use this methodology to get rid of commie care?

Just have someone in office tweet out something like, “yup, it’s not a tax, we just felt it was time to stick it to white people. We wanted to screw those Catholics too.”

Job done.


19 posted on 06/05/2017 9:56:17 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Really surprised to see what Kellyanne Conway’s husband has tweeted about this:

“These tweets may make some ppl feel better, but they certainly won’t help OSG get 5 votes in SCOTUS, which is what actually matters. Sad.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/871746245630590980

Not sure he should be out there criticizing President Trump for saying what needed to be said. The President gets to decide what matters, not you George.


20 posted on 06/05/2017 10:50:19 AM PDT by The Numbers (God, Family and Country is Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson