The last line of the article reads: We had investigated very, very thoroughly. I know this is a subject of passionate disagreement. But I knew there was no case there. Calling for the appointment of special counsel would be brutally unfair and would send the message theres something there, Comey said.
And yet, on the same day of testimony Comey states that he had his Trump memo leaked because he wanted a special counsel to be appointed in the Russian collusion investigation.
The logical conclusion, putting the two statements together: Comey is saying that “there’s something there” when it comes to the collusion investigation.
It will be interesting to see how that holds up under further scrutiny.
The logical conclusion is that fairness doesn’t apply to Trump from Comey, Democrats or the media because he’s a Russian fascist Nazi, or something. Same reason a witch didn’t need a fair trial in Salem. She’s OBVIOUSLY a witch, so it’s not necessary.