Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Helicondelta; All

The last line of the article reads: “We had investigated very, very thoroughly. I know this is a subject of passionate disagreement. But I knew there was no case there. Calling for the appointment of special counsel would be brutally unfair and would send the message there’s something there,” Comey said.

And yet, on the same day of testimony Comey states that he had his Trump memo leaked because he wanted a special counsel to be appointed in the Russian collusion investigation.

The logical conclusion, putting the two statements together: Comey is saying that “there’s something there” when it comes to the collusion investigation.

It will be interesting to see how that holds up under further scrutiny.


70 posted on 06/09/2017 9:28:51 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Norseman

The logical conclusion is that fairness doesn’t apply to Trump from Comey, Democrats or the media because he’s a Russian fascist Nazi, or something. Same reason a witch didn’t need a fair trial in Salem. She’s OBVIOUSLY a witch, so it’s not necessary.


82 posted on 06/09/2017 3:07:22 PM PDT by JediJones (We must deport all liberals until we can figure out what the hell is going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson