Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ: Trump can accept payments from foreign governments
thehill.com ^ | 6/9/17 | Brandon Carter

Posted on 06/10/2017 12:10:28 PM PDT by ColdOne

Lawyers for the Justice Department are arguing that President Trump isn’t violating a Constitutional provision that bars federal officials from accepting payments from foreign governments because the clause doesn’t apply to certain transactions.

In a new brief asking a judge to throw out a lawsuit brought against Trump by ethics watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), DOJ lawyers contend that the foreign emoluments clause doesn’t apply to “fair-market commercial transactions” like payments for hotel rooms and golf club fees, according to Bloomberg.

Trump administration lawyers also argue that CREW and other plaintiffs lack legal standing to bring the case against Trump and that Congress, not the court system, should determine whether Trump is in violation of the emoluments clause.

CREW filed the lawsuit during Trump’s first week in office “to stop President Trump from violating the Constitution by illegally receiving payments from foreign governments."

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: nlz; trumpforeignmoney; trumpforeignpay
Have they brought charges against Trump yet on the 2 scoops of ice cream caper?
1 posted on 06/10/2017 12:10:29 PM PDT by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
CREW and other plaintiffs lack legal standing

That only works for Obama...

2 posted on 06/10/2017 12:21:19 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The left is pretty much all idiots all the time.


3 posted on 06/10/2017 12:24:05 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Hillary already proved this can be done, considering the hundreds of millions that went into the Clinton Fund for access to the WH


4 posted on 06/10/2017 12:25:00 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

There are audit implications, but the founders did not expect elected officials to shut down their farms or law practices, nor to exclude foreign clients or customers absent a controlling statute.


5 posted on 06/10/2017 12:55:57 PM PDT by jimfree (My16 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Indeed, GW,was,one of the country’s leading distillers.


6 posted on 06/10/2017 3:17:38 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
...ethics watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)...

I'd like to see the results of CREW's investigation of the Clinton foundation... < /sarc >

7 posted on 06/12/2017 6:38:51 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson