To: blueplum
There’s this new invention that would have prevented that - it’s called RADAR.
3 posted on
06/16/2017 2:47:32 PM PDT by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: grobdriver
U.S. Navy destroyer USS Fitzgerald collided with a Philippine container ship, ACX Crystal ...................
14 posted on
06/16/2017 2:52:11 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Unless you eat The Bread of Life, you are toast!.......................)
To: grobdriver
There are narrow sea lanes there with a lot of traffic. Even with your radar on you are on visual alert.
A container ship will travel pretty far even in full astern and strong current. They’re BIG. It’s possible the container ship strayed off course or even purposely rammed the destroyer. Lot’s of true believers in the Philippines.
Would the Captain fire hell into a close commercial container ship that suddenly maneuvers into him broadside or would he hold fire?
74 posted on
06/16/2017 3:52:18 PM PDT by
outofsalt
( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything)
To: grobdriver
I’ve been in a collision on a US Navy ship with another US Navy ship. You can have all the radar you want, but the human element always exists.
88 posted on
06/16/2017 4:15:22 PM PDT by
suthener
To: grobdriver
This takes both captains asleep at the wheel. It’s a giant ocean out there. Hardly 5 o’clock rush hour bumper to bumper traffic.
90 posted on
06/16/2017 4:19:58 PM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: grobdriver
Those ships don't have/use radar? When did that stop? (Sorry, no military background)
126 posted on
06/17/2017 3:33:20 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
( Poor demoncrats haven't been this mad, since the Republicans took their slaves away.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson