Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/20/2017 4:59:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

The risk to liberty is not so much the failure to grant privileges to insurgents as it is the failure to stop insurgencies.


2 posted on 06/20/2017 5:05:07 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Progressivism is 2 year olds in a poop fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Thank you, SCOTUS.


3 posted on 06/20/2017 5:09:30 AM PDT by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch were not eligible to rule in the case.

Gorsuch is new. Why the 2 commie flunkies?

5 posted on 06/20/2017 5:11:23 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Ruh roh.

So, the executive branch can’t be sued by foreign entitities for breach of their non-existent constitutional rights?


6 posted on 06/20/2017 5:11:50 AM PDT by rwilson99 (How exactly would John 3:16 not apply to Mary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Not a lawyer, but can this decision in any way have a tangential application to Trump’s immigration executive order case to the positive?


7 posted on 06/20/2017 5:12:47 AM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What constitution does Breyer follow?


9 posted on 06/20/2017 5:23:42 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The article does not explain why three justices were ineligible to rule on the case. Does anyone else know why?


10 posted on 06/20/2017 5:27:56 AM PDT by knittnmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Congress? Many, not all, of them are do nothings worried about keeping their power and paychecks.


11 posted on 06/20/2017 6:06:04 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is an issue for Congress, not the judiciary, Justice Anthony Kennedy argued in the court’s opinion

So was “homosexual marriage” . . .or the states.

But not you, you cowardly, pandering POS

GTHO You’ve been there FAR too long


12 posted on 06/20/2017 6:10:43 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (pr"Liberalism is a mental disorder" On FULL Display NOW! BOYCOTT Mexico nba NFL PepsiCO Kellogg's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bump!


20 posted on 06/20/2017 7:57:47 AM PDT by GonzoII ("If the new crime be, to believe in God, let us all be criminals" -Sheen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

They never should have been allowed to sue the government. They had no “rights” as they were here illegally.


22 posted on 06/20/2017 8:29:33 AM PDT by wastedyears (Prophecy of sky Gods, the sun and moon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

An appointee by the Seditious Muslim Bathhouse Boy or by the Felon, Boss Pantsuit, would have tipped the scales towards allowing Musloid terrorists to sue the United States.


23 posted on 06/20/2017 10:18:26 AM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

they need to deport every one of them


26 posted on 06/20/2017 2:13:01 PM PDT by Lera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson