Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What does this article say in one sentence?


2 posted on 06/24/2017 6:45:15 PM PDT by DrDude (Get rid of everything Obama or Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DrDude

Looks like CYA before Monday.


3 posted on 06/24/2017 6:47:23 PM PDT by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

“What does this article say in one sentence?”

We are Marxist hacks, and hate when the Supreme Court makes it obvious when they overturn our decisions. So let’s cover our ass.


5 posted on 06/24/2017 6:53:32 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

It says that the court created a condition that allows the US to block refugees from any country that can’t provide vetting information on the people fleeing their country.


12 posted on 06/24/2017 6:58:23 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

“What does this article say in one sentence?”

It says the 9th circuit is ignoring Supreme court edict which says exectuive orders must be interperted based upon their own text, not other previous statements of the person issuing them.

But nonetheless the 9th Circuit has decided they will permit the ‘review’ part of the travail ban to go forward with indefinite ban on immigration from countries that refuse to provide the information agencies Trump doesn’t directly instruct have deemed required about their citizens.

In short they are fine with the concept of the power of the deep state just not with President Trump directly using it.

But trump can accept their terms and still get an indefinite travel ban on all theses countries as long as the deep state decides the criteria of what it should be.


24 posted on 06/24/2017 7:27:42 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
What does this article say in one sentence?

You got that right. Reading this crap created eye strain and says nothing worthwhile.

30 posted on 06/24/2017 8:14:50 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

um...The 9th pointed the SCOTUS to Kleindienst v. Mandel and said “we ignored it, come overturn us” ?


33 posted on 06/24/2017 8:39:16 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

We want a do over.


35 posted on 06/24/2017 9:15:39 PM PDT by goodtomato (I'm really, really blessed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
A third travel ban will be based on foreign country vetting not meeting standards for information, set by US State Dept., Department of National Intelligence, and Immigration. This ban will cover more than 6 countries. Because this ban will not be issued by a Trump EO, the courts will not have resort to the rule of law invoked to strike down the first two, that legal rule being, "because the order was issued by Trump."

Three sentences instead of one. Hopefully meets your wishes even though it violates the terms of your request.

45 posted on 06/25/2017 3:59:56 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson