Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latest Supreme Court’s Religious-Freedom Message: There Are No Second-Class Citizens
National Review ^ | 06/26/2017 | David French

Posted on 06/26/2017 1:10:04 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: IronJack

No Country that has Forced Speech is free.

I would not force a Jewish baker to write “Jesus is Messiah” on a cake.

I would not force a Muslim baker to write “Jerusalem is for the Jews” on a wedding cake.

I would not force a BLM member to write “Cops are the Best!’ on a cake, either.

I would not force anyone to write or say anything that is against his or her conscience. No matter how profoundly I disagree with them.

If Jack Phillips goes to jail because he won’t write wedding greetings for a sodomy ceremony, there is

NO

religious freedom in this country.


21 posted on 06/26/2017 4:17:56 PM PDT by Persevero (Democrats haven't been this nutty since we freed their slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Persevero
It goes beyond free speech, to the heart of free association. You are no longer allowed to do business with the people you choose; you have to serve EVERYONE, regardless of how opprobrious you find them.

It's a natural outcome of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

22 posted on 06/26/2017 5:52:31 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ping for later reference


23 posted on 06/26/2017 10:56:06 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Message to Trump : I am not tired of winning yet. Please more winning ! Get your crap together fast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: klsparrow

>
In 1947 Everson v Board of Education a liberal court took the words separation between church & state out of the letter and used just those words out of context. This is where the so-called separation of church & state comes from. This his been uses ever since to remove religion from everything. The court need to put those words back in the letter and look at the complete meaning
>

Personally, I’d prefer to refer to the plain text of the Constitution: CONGRESS shall, nothing about the States, which rolls to the 9th/10th.

His letter, after the signing, can be referenced, but ultimately conveys NO bearing upon the 1st.

All we need is the courts pulling phrases out of every pamphlet/letter/parchment of the time to justify their personal wants.


24 posted on 06/27/2017 8:36:54 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson