[NobleFree]

the exclusion of Trinity Lutheran from a public benefit for which it is otherwise qualified, solely because it is a church, is odious to our Constitution all the same, and cannot stand.

Amen, Mr. Chief Justice!

[NobleFree]

Justice Sotomayor wrote a sharply worded dissent (Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined) claiming that the Court’s decision “profoundly changes” the relationship between church and state “by holding, for the first time, that the Constitution requires the government to provide public funds directly to a church.” But this is overwrought. Again, given existing precedent, the “profound change” would have been a ruling against the church. The Court would have sanctioned outright anti-religious discrimination in areas as benign as tire-recycling and playground-resurfacing. That would have pushed Establishment Clause jurisprudence back from its trending neutrality to the outright anti-religious hostility of the most far-left judicial activists.

The "wise Latina" talks out her @ss - and RBG proclaims it a bouquet.

[Steve_Seattle]

Ginsburg is a repulsive anti-Christian, Jewish bigot, as her dissent once again proves.

[The Great RJ]

Ginsburg is 84 and can’t hold on much longer. If Trump appoints another Justice with the conservative mettle of Goresuch to replace her the, “Wise Latina” will be irrelevant. Ditto for Justice Kennedy.

[Amendment10]

Noting that the misguided pope seems to have missed his calling with respect to devoting much of his papal time to politically correct global warming, seemingly unconcerned about Jesus’ “Great Commission” of Matthew 28:16-20, please consider the following.

Noting that the pope has media enemies like Trump does, on behalf of the pope I question what the pope actually said in Ecuador.

[Hostage]

The Colorado cake case will likely, sadly, be decided by Kennedy in favor of fascist homosexual commerce.

There are workarounds, and these workarounds will anger and frustrate homosexuals who seek to make Christians bow before perversion.

From the homosexual’s point of view, it is about the normalization of their lifestyle. From the Christian’s point of view, it is about leading a Godly life to the best of their ability.

The workarounds I envisage will be impenetrable unless the United States declares all commerce of any form to be subject to perversion, in effect rendering religious liberty dead.

Bear in mind that not all perverts are comprised of homosexuals and pedophiles. There exist heterosexual perverts. No one is forcing these perverted lifestyles to be outlawed except in the case of pedophilia but that too in time will be incremental in its adapation.

Christians only seek to freely assemble and associate. And by Christians, it is not meant perverts that call themselves Christian but rather those souls that continually seek to better themselves and serve their fellows before God.

The 1964 Civil Rights Act does NOT include homosexuality or any other sexual orientation in its language. But that did not stop Kennedy in his decades of decisions from demolishing what he could of traditional Christian values in the public square.

Perverts will not stop until they are fully accepted as sinless human beings at the altar of the Lord, inside the refuge of churches, requiring by legal force of non-ecclesiastical law that all Christians shall acknowledge and accept their ‘love’, meaning their view of how things are to be defined, in other words, one must abandon common sense and accept their perversion, their order, or else.

So the line must be drawn at the entrance of the Church. That line must not yield. If it does, the group affected is no longer a Church but a group in the grasp of evil. What goes on ‘outside’ the entrance lies in darkness. What goes on inside is and must always be in the light.

My view is that perverts are free to enter the Church as sinners and to seek to amend their way of life, as for any other member. But it is non-negotiable to force Christians to turn away from God and accept the edict of a human court of law, especially ‘inside the Church’.

The workarounds I envisage but will not detail at this time, pertain to defining what is ‘inside the Church’.

[ealgeone]

With this ruling by SCOTUS, in conjunction with the prior oking same sex marriage, all bets are now off. No combination of individuals can be denied anything.

Nor do I see how age laws protecting minors can now stand.

This country has long crossed a slippery slope. We're on downhill skis now.

[jacknhoo]

Sotamayor and Ginsberg need to go.

[sickoflibs]

Ping for later reference