Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis | 5 takeaways from FBI nominee Wray’s principled confirmation hearing
The Washington Post ^ | July 12, 2017 | Amber Phillips

Posted on 07/12/2017 5:27:36 PM PDT by Pinkbell

Wray's task Wednesday was to convince the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will vote to send his nomination to the full Senate for approval, that he'd rather get fired than bend to political pressure. And he attempted to do just that. Here are four key takeaways from the hearing:

1) Trump could fire Wray, too.

(Snip)

2) Wray said he'd probably resign first if things got really sticky Trump's firing of Comey because of “this Russia thing” spooked members of Congress.

(Snip)

3) Wray and Trump are polar opposites on some big issues Trump thinks torture works; Wray thinks torture is “wrong” and “ineffective.”

Trump thinks the investigation into him and his presidential campaign is “the greatest Witch Hunt of a politician in American history. Sad!” Wray said he does “not consider Director Mueller to be on a witch hunt. "

Trump's allies have tried to discredit Mueller as Trump has toyed with firing him; Wray says Mueller is a “consummate straight shooter.”

Trump won't say whether Russia alone meddled in the U.S. election; Wray says he has “no reason whatsoever to doubt the assessment of the intelligence community” that Russia did meddle.

Trump thinks Comey was a “nut job;” Wray doesn't: “In all my dealing with Jim Comey, he was a terrific lawyer, a dedicated public servant and a wonderful colleague.” Trump shared highly classified information with Russians; Wray says it'd be extremely dangerous to share classified information that could put U.S. sources abroad at risk.

4) Wray thinks the Trump administration should have handled its Russia interactions differently Wray wouldn't comment specifically on news that Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian lawyer to get dirt on Hillary Clinton.

But he did underscore that it was probably not a good idea by saying two things in particular:

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 20170; bleedingheartattack; christopherwray; chriswray; comey; confirmation; donaldtrumpjr; fbi; jamescomey; mueller; torture; trump; trumpjr; wray
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: gibsonguy

Whoever suggests these people should be fired!!!!


21 posted on 07/12/2017 7:18:37 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
Wray says it'd be extremely dangerous to share classified information that could put U.S. sources abroad at risk.

would that include telling the world how many nukes you have ?
22 posted on 07/12/2017 7:25:35 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Thank you. When the hell did Trump share highly classified information with Russians??


23 posted on 07/12/2017 7:39:02 PM PDT by VA40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Avalon Memories

That’s my line of thinking as well. I’m happiest when they are ranting and raving with a plethora of angry hit pieces.


24 posted on 07/12/2017 8:31:49 PM PDT by Pinkbell (http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2017/05/tips-for-trump-beating-russia-narrative.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

I wanted Rudy.


25 posted on 07/12/2017 8:33:27 PM PDT by Pinkbell (http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2017/05/tips-for-trump-beating-russia-narrative.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

probably Rinse or in the case of judicial appointments and FBI director maybe Sessions


26 posted on 07/12/2017 9:52:34 PM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Why was this Wray guy ever nominated for this position to start with if he can’t see the obvious.

It’s clear he’s all wrong for the job. Maybe he had to say those things to get through the nomination process but I don’t think so. He sounds like another corrupt leftist bureaucrat to me.


27 posted on 07/12/2017 10:13:57 PM PDT by Boomer (Imagine a world without leftists. Now imagine a perfect world. Oops; repeating myself again...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
Prez Trump ought to pick someone who will flip the bird to the dem senators, tell the rest of them to eff off, and spit on them, and then storm out of the hearing because that is a waste of his time.

Oh yeah, that would make good vid for the Sunday pm news.

However, he just might not get out of committee.

Or the Prez could nominate someone who keeps their powder dry until needed.

Woe is me, can't figure out what the prez is doing!

28 posted on 07/12/2017 10:33:41 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

You are missing the key difference between Gorsuch, Wray and Mueller. Trump picked the first two. He had nothing to do with selecting Mueller.


29 posted on 07/12/2017 10:49:42 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic wotk using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Now maybe these are things he has to say to get through confirmation,

************************************************************

Exactly right. If he were to say the things we would love to hear, such as Mueller is on a with hunt, etc his chances of being confirmed would be ZERO.


30 posted on 07/13/2017 1:39:22 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Can’t judge him by what he tells the senate committee - any conservative, rational person who gave them all his real views would never be confirmed.....like he said - Trump could fire him so I’ll back him and not worry about him for now.


31 posted on 07/13/2017 3:05:14 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
Wray joined King & Spalding in 2005 as a litigation partner in the firm's Washington, D.C. and Atlanta offices. Wray represented several Fortune 100 companies and chaired the King & Spalding Special Matters and Government Investigations Practice Group.[2] During his time at King & Spalding, Wray acted as New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's personal attorney during the Bridgegate scandal.[11][12] During the scandal, defense attorneys for a pair of Christie's inner circle sought access to Christie's missing cellphone.[13] Two years later, Christie's spokesman claimed that Mr. Wray had the cellphone. However, Mr. Wray did not respond to requests for confirmation. The questions regarding the whereabouts of Governor Christie's phone began as supporters of Donald J. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, awaited his decision on a running mate. Mr. Christie, whom Mr. Wray represented during the scandal, was believed to be on a short list of candidates. Judge Wigenton denied the defense’s request for the phone or its contents.[14][12]

Chris Christie did the most to keep himself out of the White House, but it sounds like Wray did a lot to keep him out of jail.

32 posted on 07/13/2017 3:46:48 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Gun buybacks are one of the most ineffectual public policies that have ever been invented")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222
He seems to have the correct "crease in his pants" for the WaPo (Yale undergrad, Yale Law School, and married to another Yalie). It also seems that he's smart enough to say the right things in a confirmation hearing. We'll find out if he was a good choice or a bad choice "in the fullness of time".

(But "principled"? He's a criminal defense lawyer!)

33 posted on 07/13/2017 4:00:15 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Gun buybacks are one of the most ineffectual public policies that have ever been invented")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
Clark got nailed on “plagiarism”. He's not going to be in the Trump admin.
34 posted on 07/13/2017 4:09:14 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Not my circus. Not my monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
I wish, when he'd been asked what he'd do if directed to use the word "matter" instead of "investigation" replied that when the protocols of investigation and indictment are followed, that issue can't arise.

Plenty of Congressional apologists for the FBI usurping the role of the prosecutor. And also amazing how many in Congress think firing Comey stops an investigation.

Wray did okay during the inquisition. He was getting tired near the end of it.

35 posted on 07/13/2017 4:32:36 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem

>In all my dealing with Jim Comey, he was a terrific lawyer, a dedicated public servant and a wonderful colleague.

Sounds like another FBI director that can read the intent of another.


36 posted on 07/13/2017 8:29:47 AM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson