Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is why so many Republicans are ready to ignore public opinion on health care
Washington Post ^ | June 27, 2017 | David C. Barker and Christopher Jan Carman

Posted on 07/13/2017 5:40:18 PM PDT by Still Thinking

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and the GOP leadership are scrambling this week to corral 50 out of 52 Republican votes for an historically unpopular health-care bill. Why did so many House Republicans already vote for a bill that large majorities in every state detest? And why are their Senate colleagues considering walking the same plank, given the electoral risk?

In our book, “Representing Red and Blue: How the Culture Wars Change the Way Citizens Speak and Politicians Listen,” we find that thumbing one’s nose at public opinion might spell trouble for elected Democrats. But Republicans typically have much less to fear, because most GOP voters don’t expect — or even want — their representatives to follow the public will.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obamacare; senate; senatehealthcare; trumpcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Where to start, where to start

If the majority of the public disagree with this, it's no doubt because, as usual, Quisling "Republicans" are TO THE LEFT of their "constituents" and are selling out to leftist tyranny. No burning down the homes of those who voted for Ebolacare in the first place, no national day set aside for pissing in their graves, etc. Yet they try to suggest that the bill is some sort of Uber-conservative thing the public doesn't like because they like Ebolacare, despite the unrelenting unpopularity of it, and the electoral success of candidates who promised its repeal.

Then they try to make the case that since (R) voters try to hold their "representatives" responsible, that those legislators are therefore MORE insulated from voter backlash than Dems. D'oh! If R's are insulated, it's because the Party, sometimes with help from the Dems, conspires against the voters to prevent the nomination and election of good, principled candidates.

The crack is strong in this one.

1 posted on 07/13/2017 5:40:18 PM PDT by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

We want them to do what we elected them to do, and we WILL punish them if they don’t.


2 posted on 07/13/2017 5:42:49 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

We need to do what we did in novermber, DRAIN THE SWAMP! WE THE PEOPLE will do it again!


3 posted on 07/13/2017 5:46:22 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (Trump plays chess the rest are still playing checkers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

The main reason is that Trump made a promise.


4 posted on 07/13/2017 5:50:24 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Because we keep electing them despite them lying 100% of the time.


5 posted on 07/13/2017 5:54:43 PM PDT by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

This past November we re-elected 98% of the swamp.

McCain, Rubio, Hoeven and Murkowsky were all re-elected despite voting for Rubio’s amnesty bill.

Corker, Hatch, Heller and Flake voted for Rubio’ amnesty and are up in 2018.

WE have to drain the swamp, Trump can’t do it for us.


6 posted on 07/13/2017 6:09:15 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

The Swampire strikes back.


7 posted on 07/13/2017 6:14:58 PM PDT by sourcery (Non Acquiescit: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

There are a portion of GOP members that are ‘owned’ meaning someone has something on them. They are compromised.

The way they survive is by learning to be a master of lies and trickery.


8 posted on 07/13/2017 6:30:19 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Since 2010 there has been 61 votes on repeal and replace. All republican senators voted to do just that. But it did not matter because harry reid would not bring it forward. So the republicans got to say, like John Swiftboat Kerry, "I voted for it before I voted against it." Then it did not count. Now that it does count the sniveling coward republicans won't vote for anything substantial. They may give us obama-lite, with is sound and fury and signifies nothing. The republicans will lose the senate and possibly the house in 2018 if they do not become vertebrates. Think about it.....these bastards do not care about their constiuents. All they care about their own next election. How can they walk the tightrope and stay in office.

They have squandered our children future. Our kids will never be able to even pay the interest on the debt. It is a planned destruction. But they are the oligarch.

9 posted on 07/13/2017 6:37:51 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (proawakileftist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

69% of Americans opposed Obamacare. The Democrats passed it anyway - without even a single Republican vote in its favor.

And?


10 posted on 07/13/2017 6:41:34 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

RETROACTIVE REFUND!

Demand it!

o Obamacare is denial of service.
o People are denied critical care.
o People are denied Doctors & Hospitals.

o Grandma is dying!

Forget repeal.
DEMAND your Obamacare RETROACTIVE REFUND now!

You heard it here first folks. :-)


11 posted on 07/13/2017 6:41:34 PM PDT by TheNext (Obamacare RETROACTIVE REFUND!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Just repeal it. We don’t need a “replace.”


12 posted on 07/13/2017 6:44:02 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Agreed. This “replace” does not get rid of the insurance company bailouts!


13 posted on 07/13/2017 6:54:18 PM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

So “public opinion” = rat opinion. Gotcha, compost.


14 posted on 07/13/2017 6:55:26 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

What this article, and many on our side, miss is that there is sadly a very, very significant group of voters who WANT some sort of government health-care help.

This is why a straight “repeal” was never possible after so many insurance companies left certain markets. People were left without any options or coverage-—as Obama intended it.

Pure repeal wouldn’t address that. Now, many of us would say, well, too bad, the Constitution doesn’t allow it, but almost NO politician is going to do that. So we will have some sort of Obamacare lite or two-tiered system eventually.


15 posted on 07/13/2017 7:05:14 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Totally.


16 posted on 07/13/2017 7:06:44 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Sure seems to be the case.


17 posted on 07/13/2017 7:07:38 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

This past November we re-elected 98% of the swamp.

McCain, Rubio, Hoeven and Murkowsky were all re-elected despite voting for Rubio’s amnesty bill.

Corker, Hatch, Heller and Flake voted for Rubio’ amnesty and are up in 2018.

WE have to drain the swamp, Trump can’t do it for us.


18 posted on 07/13/2017 7:08:25 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Agreed, 100%.


19 posted on 07/13/2017 7:09:16 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Good observations. But too, remember that the Washington Post writers, readers, AND editors/owners do NOT go outside the liberal think-speak-talk-write of Washington DC-NYC-SFO-LA. They do NOT associate with anybody who thinks differently than their biases and hatred. So, to a Wash Post editor, there is NO people who are worth listening to as conservatives, or even as “Americans” - America is the hated ones to them.


20 posted on 07/13/2017 8:21:55 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson