Perhaps Jeff Bezos can pay for this. The US taxpayer is out of money.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
2 posted on
07/28/2017 8:23:36 AM PDT by
griswold3
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Another feel good story.....
3 posted on
07/28/2017 8:27:44 AM PDT by
Hogblog
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Climate lab sits empty...
5 posted on
07/28/2017 8:39:07 AM PDT by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Worse, the whole national greenhouse-gas monitoring program may be at risk, if Congress approves President Trumps proposed cuts to climate science. That would be awesome! And close NOAA while you're at it.
6 posted on
07/28/2017 8:40:15 AM PDT by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Sierra Club can pony up a paltry $5 million if they really want to. Let them fund their own boondoggles.
Oh wait, they suck off the taxpayer’s teat already. Let’s stop that nonsense, too.
7 posted on
07/28/2017 8:43:57 AM PDT by
piasa
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I don’t think they really want it up and running, because it will only prove how minuscule is the proportion of fossil fuel sourced CO2 compared to natural sources.
8 posted on
07/28/2017 8:44:12 AM PDT by
Excellence
(Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
China is already heavily investing in atmospheric monitoring, including carbon 14 research.
Well, at the rate China is building coal-fired power plants, they certainly won't need to worry about how to power their research machinery.
9 posted on
07/28/2017 8:46:28 AM PDT by
Bob
(Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"...a laboratory outfitted with specially reinforced concrete floors sits dark and empty..."
Perhaps one day we can say the same about the NY Times.
11 posted on
07/28/2017 8:51:43 AM PDT by
Interesting Times
(WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Isn’t one of these machines enough? If the Chinese have already wasted their money making one, why should the United States be bothered making another?
Tens of billions in tax dollars have been wasted on global warming research... Man can not control the weather, never has controlled the weather and never will. Global warming is a scare tactic created by socialist and liberals to syphon tax dollars from legitimate programs to spend on phony baloney programs and projects that enrich them and their followers.
12 posted on
07/28/2017 8:52:19 AM PDT by
jerod
(Socialism=Governance by Government - The National Socialist German Workers' Party is a good example.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Remember the Movie “Contact”.
Why just build one when you can build two for twice the price?
14 posted on
07/28/2017 8:56:17 AM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(The way Liberals carry on about Deportation, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
China is already heavily investing in atmospheric monitoring, including carbon 14 research. Its just one more example of how an Asian superpower is stepping up to embrace the future as America chooses to render itself irrelevant.Hillary Rosner imagines herself to be a 'journalist', yet she trots out ridiculous leftist falsehoods (that's a polite way of saying 'ugly Communist-inspired lies') like this one that only an idiot could believe throughout her writing.
She's just a common-variety, foolish-but-useful idiot wrongly occupying a position that ought to be held by someone more honest and unbiased and intelligent.
Evidently Hillary Rosner was absent from school when they held those 'critical thinking 101' classes.
15 posted on
07/28/2017 9:02:19 AM PDT by
Zeppo
("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What a complete waste of money.
16 posted on
07/28/2017 9:46:39 AM PDT by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(Trump: What to do now I can't repeal Obamacare? I know, lets start a war with Russia!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Perhaps Jeff Bezos can pay for this.
_____________
Or Tom Steyer, or George Soros. Aren’t they VERY CONCERNED about climate change & all that? Lots of deep pockets out there to tap. They don’t need taxpayer dollars.
20 posted on
07/28/2017 11:45:17 AM PDT by
Twotone
To: Oldeconomybuyer
...if Congress approves President Trumps proposed cuts to climate science.Who writes this crap?
What climate science??
There has been no real science related to climate since about 1971...
21 posted on
07/28/2017 7:38:14 PM PDT by
publius911
(Less Tweets More Golf! it works!!!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Losing that program would be catastrophic to the worlds ability to track and address climate change. The monitoring system, called the Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network and run by NOAA, is the most extensive network of its kind. Really? Europe, China, Japan, South Korea aren't up to the task, for a measly five-mil? Lets try again, shall we,
Losing that program would be catastrophic to the worlds ability to track and address climate change. The monitoring system, called the Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network and run by NOAA, is the most extensive network of its kind. numerous rice bowls depending on NOAA to come up with taxpayer money.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson