The horse is out of the barn on that one. Even if the 19th were repealed, no state or U.S. territory is going to ban women from voting.
Yup.
It’s funny though. A good friend’s mom used to be a leftist and stout feminist. She now makes me look like a lib by comparison. She has stated the 19th Amendment is the worse thing that ever happened to the country on the political front. (We actually talk politics weekly. She is SMART and well informed.)
She does not have a high opinion of most young and dumb female voters, of which she admits she was once one.
And then don’t get me started about milenials. Lol.
While I do not agree, won’t argue with her on the point. After all, without the young and dumb female leftist vote, pretty much no Demscum would have been elected to federal office for the last hundred years or so.
While I agree, women need to understand that one of the very few constitutionally enumerated federal powers that their 19th Amendment-protect right to vote actually won for them with respect to having a voice in shaping federal domestic policy is to help decide how the US Mail Service (1.8.7) is run.
In other words, nearly all federal social spending programs that they trade their votes for are actually based on unique state powers and uniquely associated state revenues that the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification feds have stolen from the states, state revenues stolen by means of unconstitutional federal taxes.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
The constitutional reality is that the Founding States had expected all legal voters to work with their state lawmakers, not the feds, for the state social spending programs that they want. This is evidenced by the following excerpts.
"Our citizens have wisely formed themselves into one nation as to others and several States as among themselves. To the united nation belong our external and mutual relations; to each State, severally, the care of our persons, our property, our reputation and religious freedom [emphasis added]. Thomas Jefferson: To Rhode Island Assembly, 1801.
"... the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Federal Constitution, is in the States, and not in the Federal Government [emphasis added]." Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe, 1866. (See middle of third column.)
Drain the swamp sewer! Drain the sewer!
Remember in November 2018 !
Since corrupt Congress is the biggest part of the sewer (imo) that Trump wants to drain, it is actually up to patriots to drain the sewer in the 2018 elections, patriots supporting Trump by electing as many new members of Congress as they can who will support Trump.
In the meanwhile, patriots need to make sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting candidates on the primary ballots.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitutions Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal governments powers.
Patriots also need to make sure that candidates are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal governments limited powers listed in this post.
Also, unlike incumbent members of Congress who wrongly remained silent while misguided state officials abridged the constitutionally enumerated rights of citizens during the lawless Obama Administration, patriots need to make sure that candidates on the 2018 primary ballots commit to the following.
Candidates need to commit to making and enforcing 14th Amendment-related laws to prosecute misguided state officials who use state powers to abridge constitutionally enumerated protections, 1st Amendment-protected religious expression and free speech for example, such actions prohibited by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Again, drain the sewer! Drain the sewer!