Replies

This is actually a form of “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” playing out before our very eyes.

I highly recommend viewing the movie if you’ve not seen it.

Great Post!

Once we get into “whatever it takes” country, then the people may find it necessary to do whatever it takes to restore the Republic. Trump needs to keep his base informed, energized and ready to be mobilized. The day may come when millions of people marching on the swamp will be necessary to stop an attempted coup.

For now, it's a 'soft war' aimed at nullification of the election, gradual desensitization of the electorate to TOLERATE baby steps taken towards REMOVING Trump from office.

This is a slow 'progressive' action, not a revolutionary action by the Deep State on behalf of the Soros Global Cabal.

MUELLER BEING ALLOWED TO HOLD HIS POSITION WHILE OPENLY VIOLATING FEDERAL 'CONFLICT OF INTEREST' LAWS IS AN AFFRONT TO OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AND MUST BE STOPPED.. NOW!!!

Including assassination, just ask Seth Rich...

...and pray for President Trump.

Pray hard.

It may be the swamp. It may be for good reason.

For some reason there must be a "fear" that something is going to come out of the special prosecutor that will cause Trump removed from office. There simply are too many things being rationalized to assign blame for whatever happens.

I was listening to Bill Cunningham last night defend Trump, yet his defense was almost an indictment. Neophyte at appointing an Attorney General and now he doesn't have someone who could redirect an investigation. Trump's own words and actions could be used against him because he doesn't understand how things work in DC.

Something tells me there's a good chance of something negative coming down the pike and the talkers are preparing us for it.

The public may accept a smidgen of corruption. But I will not.

They will stop trying to remove President Trump when Clinton, Podesta and Soros are gone from the scene.

They are totally willing to do this. That is, in fact, what they are doing in this attempt to get rid of Trump. There isn’t a crime. There isn’t any high crime or misdemeanor. There’s nothing yet other than they don’t like the guy and they don’t like his personality and they don’t like the way he talks and they don’t like the way he tweets and they don’t like the way he does his hair, and they don’t like the way he goes about talking about people. They gotta get rid of him.

No Rush, I am surprised you missed it.

They don't like the fact that they are not able to control President Trump and President Trump is making progress against their agenda.

We need to turn out at least a million people in the streets of DC for a pro-Trump rally.

(Cleveland turned out that many to celebrate a basketball team).

Everyone needs to carry the same sign.

“We came unarmed. This time.”

Thanks.

A COUP D'ÉTAT IS UNDERWAY IN THE UNITED STATES.
IT IS AN ATTEMPT TO OVERTHROW THE LAWFULLY ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST STOP THIS COUP D'ÉTAT IMMEDIATELY!

Please forgive what is probably a very dumb and naïve question, but could the SCOTUS possibly become involved?

Ubama is an American hating punk.
Not a genius but not a dummy either.
Definitely willing to break the rules.
He is/was more than willing to go along,too.
That is why he sought out the most radical mentors.
That is why he had handlers all along the way.

I like Savage’s contention that such a move will result in “The Day of the Locust”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Locust

To RUSH LIMBAUGH himself:

Rush, I've got TWO articles on this general subject that I want you to analyze and comment on on your radio show.
But both articles are long.

FIRST

MCMASTER’S NSC COUP AGAINST TRUMP PURGES CRITICS OF ISLAM AND OBAMA
The National Security Council is becoming a national security threat.

SECOND

TAXICAB DEPRESSIONS titled "The Pig Trap"

America is at that awkward stage. It’s too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.
Claire Wolfe, 101 Things to Do ‘Til the Revolution (1996)

Here are the comments from the articles I found important.

MCMASTER’S NSC COUP AGAINST TRUMP PURGES CRITICS OF ISLAM AND OBAMA
The National Security Council is becoming a national security threat.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism.

Derek Harvey was a man who saw things coming. He had warned of Al Qaeda when most chose to ignore it. He had seen the Sunni insurgency rising when most chose to deny it. The former Army colonel had made his reputation by learning the lay of the land. In Iraq that meant sleeping on mud floors and digging into documents to figure out where the threat was coming from. It was hard to imagine anyone better qualified to serve as President Trump’s top Middle East adviser at the National Security Council than a man who had been on the ground in Iraq and who had seen it all. ... Just like in Iraq, Harvey began digging at the NSC. He came up with a list of Obama holdovers who were leaking to the press. McMaster, the new head of the NSC, REFUSED TO FIRE ANY OF THEM. McMaster had a different list of people he wanted to fire. It was easy to make the list. Harvey was on it. All you had to do was name Islamic terrorism as the problem and oppose the Iran Deal. If you came in with Flynn, you would be out. If you were loyal to Trump, your days were numbered. And if you warned about Obama holdovers undermining the new administration, you were a target. One of McMaster’s first acts at the NSC was to ban any mention of “Obama holdovers.” Not only did the McMaster coup purge Harvey, who had assembled the holdover list, but his biggest target was Ezra Watnick-Cohen, who had exposed the eavesdropping on Trump officials by Obama personnel. Ezra Watnick-Cohen had provided proof of the Obama surveillance to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes. McMaster, however, was desperately working to fire him and replace him with Linda Weissgold. McMaster’s choice to replace Watnick-Cohen was the woman who helped draft the Benghazi talking points which blamed the Islamic terrorist attack on a video protest. After protests by Bannon and Kushner, President Trump overruled McMaster. Watnick-Cohen stayed. For a while. Now Ezra Watnick-Cohen has been fired anyway. According to the media, Watnick-Cohen was guilty of “anti-Muslim fervor” and “hardline views.” And there’s no room for anyone telling the truth about Islamic terrorism at McMaster’s NSC. McMaster had even demanded that President Trump refrain from telling the truth about Islamic terrorism. Another of his targets was Rich Higgins, who had written a memo warning of the role of the left in undermining counterterrorism. Higgins had served as a director for strategic planning at the NSC. He had warned in plain language about the threat of Islamic terrorism, of Sharia law, of the Hijrah colonization by Islamic migrants, of the Muslim Brotherhood, and of its alliance with the left as strategic threats. Higgins had stood by Trump during the Khizr Khan attacks. And he had written a memo warning that "the left is aligned with Islamist organizations at local, national, and international levels" and that “they operate in social media, television, the 24-hour news cycle in all media and are entrenched at the upper levels of the bureaucracies.” Like Harvey and Ezra Watnick-Cohen, Higgins had warned of an enemy within. And paid the price. McMaster’s cronies had allegedly used the NSC’s email system to track down the source of the memo. The left and its useful idiots were indeed entrenched at the upper level of the bureaucracy. Higgins was fired. Like Harvey and Watnick-Cohen, Higgins had also become too dangerous to the Obama holdovers. Harvey had assembled a list of names and a plan to dismantle the Iranian nuclear deal. Watnick-Cohen had dug into the Obama surveillance of Trump officials. And Higgins had sought to declassify Presidential Study Directive 11. PSD-11 was the secret blueprint of Obama’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood. Pete Hoekstra, the former Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, linked PSD-11 to the rise of ISIS and called for its declassification. Replacing Harvey is Michael Bell. When the Washington Post needed someone to badmouth Dr. Gorka, they turned to Bell: the former chancellor of the College of International Security Affairs at the National Defense University.. Bell suggested that Dr. Gorka was an uneven scholar. And Dr. Gorka was accused of failing to incorporate other perspectives on Islam. The pattern has never been hard to spot. McMaster forced out K.T. McFarland from her role as Deputy National Security Advisor. Slotted in was Dina Habib-Powell. McFarland was an Oxford and Cambridge grad who had worked at the Pentagon for the Reagan administration. Dina Habib-Powell had no national security background. She was an Egyptian-American immigrant and former Bush gatekeeper whose pals included Huma Abedin and Valerie Jarrett. Powell, who has been described as the Republican Huma, said that Abedin “feels a deep responsibility to encourage more mutual understanding between her beliefs and culture and American culture.” When visiting Egypt, Habib-Powell had assured the locals of how Bush, after September 11, “visited a mosque, took off his shoes and paid his respects.” "I see the president talk of Islam as a religion of peace, I see him host an iftar every year,” she gushed. K.T. McFarland had written that “Global Islamist jihad is at war with all of Western civilization.” It’s not hard to see why McMaster pushed out McFarland and elevated Habib-Powell. Habib-Powell had attended the Iftar dinner with members of Muslim Brotherhood front groups. You can see her photographed at the American Task Force of Palestine gala. The ATFP was originally Rashid Khalidi’s American Committee on Jerusalem. She was there as a presenter at the Middle East Institute after a speech by Hanan Ashrawi. Her achievements under Bush included cultural exchanges with Iran, as well as cash for the Palestinian Authority and for Lebanon after the Hezbollah war with Israel. While President Trump fights to restrict Muslim immigration, at his side is the woman who had once bragged on CNN, “Over 90% of student visas are now issued in under a week, and that is in the Middle East.” But that is typical of the McMaster revamp of the NSC. It’s populated by swamp creatures who oppose the positions that President Trump ran on. And who are doing everything possible to undermine them. President Trump promised a reset from Obama’s anti-Israel policies. McMaster picked Kris Bauman as the NSC’s point man on Israel. Bauman had defended Islamic terrorists and blamed Israel for the violence. He had urged pressure on Israel as the solution. Ideas like that fit in at McMaster’s NSC. Meanwhile Derek Harvey, who had tried to halt Obama’s $221 million terror funding prize to the Palestinian Authority, was forced out. This too is part of the pattern. As Caroline Glick has pointed out, the personnel being purged in the McMaster coup “are pro-Israel and oppose the Iran nuclear deal.” When Adam Lovinger urged that “more attention be given to the threat of Iran and Islamic extremism,” his security clearance was revoked. Robin Townley was forced out in the same way. Meanwhile, McMaster sent a letter to Susan Rice, Obama’s former National Security Adviser, assuring her that the NSC would work with her to “allow you access to classified information.” He claimed that Rice's continued access to classified information is "consistent with the national security interests of the United States." Why does Susan Rice, who is alleged to have participated in the Obama eavesdropping on Trump people, need access to classified information? What national security purpose is served by it? The same national security purpose that is served by McMaster’s purge of anyone at the NSC who dares to name Islamic terrorism, who wants a tougher stance on Iran, and who asks tough questions. And the purge of reformers and original thinkers is only beginning. The latest reports say that McMaster has a list of enemies who will be ousted from the NSC. And when that is done, the NSC will be a purely Obama-Bush operation. The consensus will be that the Iran Deal must stay, that Islam has nothing to do with Islamic terrorism, that we need to find ways to work with the aspirations of the Muslim Brotherhood, and that Israel must make concessions to terrorists. If you loved the foreign policy that brought us 9/11, ISIS, and billions in funding to terrorists from Syria to Libya to the West Bank, you won’t be able to get enough of McMaster’s brand new NSC. And neither will America’s enemies. The swamp is overflowing. The National Security Council is becoming a national security threat. President Bush was a good man. And he meant well. But he was surrounded by officials who lied to him. They filled his administration with appeasers and paraded Islamists through the Oval Office. And by the time they were done, thousands more Americans had died and Islamists had developed an even bigger foothold on American soil than they had before September 11. This cannot be allowed to happen again. If you love America, if you believe that Islamic terrorism needs to be fought, not appeased, then it’s time to take a stand against the McMaster coup and his Obama holdover allies, for our security and future. It’s not just about a bunch of names. It’s about the survival of America.

With EIGHT Democrats on the temporary assignment of the Twelve, HOW can we expect JUSTICE to be done ?

WHY isn't Debbie Wassermann Schultz,

being investigated by this panel of MOSTLY DemocRATS ?

how many DemocRATS are likely to be EXPOSED

Second article and my summary:

America is at that awkward stage. It’s too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.
Claire Wolfe, 101 Things to Do ‘Til the Revolution (1996)

when

He had

Eric Holder being held in contempt of Congress over the Fast and Furious fiasco.

"These people are playing with matches…
I don’t think they understand the scope and scale of the wildfire they are flirting with.
They are fucking around with a civil war that could last a decade and cause millions of deaths…
and the sad truth is that 95% of the problems we have in this country could be solved tomorrow, by noon…
simply by dragging 100 people out in the street and shooting them in the fucking head.”

“Yeah, I probably would…”

So as I think about all the horrible shit the government is doing today, I can't help but think about the Founders,
and what they would think about current events and the state of the republic they left to their heirs.

… What would the Founders think about the government secretly and illegally trafficking thousands of military-grade arms to criminals, brigands, and pirates,
knowing full well that those criminals will kill thousands of innocent people with said arms,
as a ploy to disarm their own citizenry
… and when caught red-handed in this criminal and despicable act,
the governmental appointee responsible for executing this disgraceful policy lies, dissembles, and stonewalls,
and suffers no sanction or penalty ?

What would they think of the government reading, and oftentimes copying and warehousing, every single letter of their correspondence, their diaries, their conversations, their most private and intimate of communications ?

What would they think of government agents standing on rooftops and street corners,
monitoring and documenting the comings and goings of every citizen every day of his life,
whom they speak with and associate with, and what they purchase and from whom ?

What would they think about their government spying on journalists, town criers, and pamphleteers,
and swearing out false oaths to judges to have them surveilled ?

What would they think about government tax agents given specific orders to harass, intimidate, penalize, and obstruct any person who speaks for peaceful, legislative reform of the government
or is critical of the government, even demanding that they document the content of their prayers ?

What would they think about a government that routinely ignores laws already on the books solely for material and political gain,
a government that creates punitive laws through specious methods, and then exempts themselves from being subject to those laws,
and when their agents, officials, and appointees are caught in serious crimes and malfeasance, they are simply reassigned and protected by the government,
never to face trial or pay any penalty for their acts or the harm they inflict on ordinary citizens ?

I’ll tell you what I believe… I believe the shooting would have already started.
It’s not that I want something terrible to happen, it’s that I am positively astonished that something terrible hasn’t already happened.

The Founders set out to create a limited government.
They did not create a Constitution that spelled out what the government may not do, they created a Constitution that detailed exactly and precisely what the federal government MAY do, and nothing more.
This far, and no further.
All other powers were specifically and deliberately left to the individual states, and to the people themselves.
The Bill of Rights was added at the insistence of several of the Founders to protect the individual citizen from future tyranny and avaricious government.

… I see only two paths for America today.

First,
some miracle will happen in which a couple hundred constitutionalists like Ted Cruz and Mike Lee and Trey Gowdy will be elected to the House and Senate over the next few election cycles,
and something resembling the Founder’s republic will be restored.
But given the current climate of relentless progressivism, massive bureaucracy, government dependence, and voter ignorance, that seems like a very remote possibility.

The second path is
that complacency, ignorance, and indifference will allow more progressives and communists to be elected,
the federal government will continue to grow and amass power unchecked,
and one day very soon, we will we will witness the birth of a police state that will make the Gestapo, the KGB, and the Stasi look like pikers and dilettantes.

Hell, the argument could be made that the police state is already here.

… I can’t get Kevin and the pig trap out of my head,
because it is a perfect metaphor for the surveillance state our government has built.
It has been erected slowly over time, one piece at a time, so as to not panic the populace.
And the government seems to have been wildly successful,
because the American population at large seems completely unphased and unalarmed at what has been built over the last twenty or thirty years.

… This isn’t a Republican vs. Democrat issue,
it isn’t even a conservative vs. liberal issue…
this is an American vs. un-American issue.
Do you wish to be a free American,
or will you accept becoming a slave to a massive and all-powerful police state?
You are either an advocate for freedom and limited government,
or you are an advocate for tyranny.
There is no gray area, no middle ground to be found here.
This government has slowly amassed powers over the last hundred years that would horrify the Founders of this nation.

I can’t believe the shooting hasn’t already started.

Sorry… I just don’t buy it.

Someone is going to die…
it might be a cop or a government official,
but I think it is going to be some average Joe, some nobody…
some grocery clerk, some bricklayer, some bartender,
some taxi driver, some waitress, some truck driver,
some rancher in Nevada, some nobody dockworker like Crispus Attucks.

Or maybe it will be a child,
shot in a gun raid or denied medical treatment by ObamaCare.

Someone is going to die,
and it will be the spark that brings about The Realignment Of America.

I abhor violence.
I don’t want any of this, but it is inevitable, at this point.
Our government is utterly lawless.
Our representative republic is gone.
These people no longer serve the interests of the American people,
they serve their own elite interests,
and the citizens of the United States have become tax cattle to be managed, milked, and controlled.
And the security state they have erected is not designed to protect US,
it is designed to protect THEM.

Sharpen your tusks.
I simply don’t believe we are going to be able to vote our way out of the pig trap.