[cincinnati65]

If you’re running a mile relay, do you want the four fastest runners, or the most diverse team?

[jeffc]

But who cares as long as men are the ones getting the short end of the stick, right?

The creed of the Feminazi (though, never actually spoken...).

[datricker]

Google is evil

[Hat-Trick]

Why is it we NEVER hear the Feminazi’s criticizing the objectification of women by islam?

Apparently, getting more women top paying technology jobs regardless of their desire or aptitude to perform those jobs is a bigger problem than the systemic female genital mutilation that occurs in many parts of the world, even in Minnesota, all in the name of islam.

[RayChuang88]

This is a story that the Left will try its hardest to suppress because it could end up hurting the hard-Left leaning technology industry.

Not only does Google suffer from this groupthink problem, but in many ways it's even worse at Facebook and Twitter. It won't be long before some whistleblower comes out of the shadows and accuses Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey of fostering a similar groupthink environment.

[pangaea6]

One of the reasons society is what is, God’s plan of manly leadership is being pushed aside for women’s equality, and God didn’t design us that way. There should be more men in college and in grad school, that should be pushed, not higher diversity.

[Travis McGee]

[theBuckwheat]

“Are women less capable of doing tech on a high level? “

Being capable and being willing to throw your heart and soul into something and to work nights and weekends on long projects are two different things. In my decades in IT, few women are willing to do the later and that does change their value to their employers.

No amount of ideology or good wishes can alter those facts. When people do, only bad things happen.

[Bernard]

So men get degrees in useful fields, while women focus on what could be called “pursuits of the idle rich”. Great idea if you are independently wealthy, but not a recipe for success as a responsible head of household. Since women focus on the degrees that don’t provide a return on investment, it means that things have not changed much since the 1950’s, when many girls went to college to major in finding a husband. Now it has a different name, and increasingly a different result.

[VRW Conspirator]

There is nothing “modern” about feminism! It is ancient in its roots.

[exDemMom]

That’s something you’re not supposed to say because the Gods of Feminism demand that we all bow down to the false idea that men and women are all exactly equal in every way that benefits women and that any differences that don’t work to the benefit of women must be explained by discrimination.

The Gods of Feminism have been unable to overcome this barrier of biology, that women are actually interested in different things than men. So they've ramped it up now. They're pretending that the biological differences between men and women are nothing, that the fact that one has different genitalia than the other is no more consequential than the fact that some people have brown hair, some have blond, and a very few have orange. Never mind that women lose bigly when men can pretend to be women and outdo them in those areas reserved for women (women's sports). This only creates cognitive dissonance, which is a normal state for liberals.

[Skooz]

bfl

[exDemMom]

Put another way, there are more dumb men than dumb women, but male geniuses also outnumber female geniuses 7-to-1. So when you’re talking about a highly competitive, highly intellectual field, men are typically going to outstrip women in numbers almost by default.

Even in areas where genius women pursue careers in STEM fields, they are only drawn to certain careers. And how they conduct themselves in those careers is different from the way men conduct themselves. I see this every day... the majority (11/15) of the Ph.D. level scientists I supervise are men, and the men are far more focused on the science and more likely to put in long hours. I see other differences, as well. While I do not have a large sample size, I suspect that a systematic study would confirm that the differences I see are real.

[9YearLurker]

All that I took issue with was the claim that conservatives are blinded to “climate change”.

And no, having a masters in biology from Harvard does not make him an authority on the subject. He just needed such a claim in order to posit the bogus idea that both authoritarian “liberals” and classical liberals are needed for a healthy society.

[Neoliberalnot]

The goal is to crap on the normal American white male.

[tbpiper]

Liberals always seem to find it easier to lie about what someone says and then kick the stuffing out of the strawman than to deal with their real argument.

That's a bellringer bit of truth.

[Koracan]

Who cares about Google.
if it would be a traditional Company with an Org Chart
It has 2 departments:: 10% Entertainment, 90% Sales Force
using inter-connectivity as a business vehicle.
same old, just with more noise, less transparent, cluttered, real-world uselessness. false pretension of being High Tech.

GOOG Income/share:....
Tangible Book Value 172.52 ...
Working Capital 128.24 ...
Sales 128.43 ...
Operating Profit 33.17...

Who knew that in the future, the richest entity in the world makes all it's money by stomping the purple haze of the Binary world.

[HokieMom]

[aquila48]

Bookmark

[Political Junkie Too]

I like how Damore questioned (page 9) why liberals aren't calling for more "Discriminating just to increase...women’s representation in the homeless, work-related and violent deaths, prisons, and school dropouts."

I guess the natural differentiators that result in THOSE disparities is to be ignored.

-PJ