This Trump’s America, haul him off to GTMO. There are ways to squeeze him there and leave absolutely no marks at all.
My $$ says that a lot of Dems hired this bunch just to boost their “diversity” credentials.
Why did she hire the Awan brothers? At the request of a donor? Hillary?
So why did they let the wife, Hina Alvi, continue on to Pakistan that day....?
Celebrate DIVERSITY!
It’ll get ALL of us killed!...................
The answer to most questions that this investigation raises can be found in one word:
‘Blackmail’.
Oh, and Trump is a racist! Never mind Democrats facilitating the transfer of classified information to our enemies, Trump is a racist! That’s what’s really important this week.
Burgeoning? Were it not for this site, I would not know anything was going on. This matter is on full encryption mode.
As they did with other Clinton “associates” (like Norman Hsu, Ng Lap Seng, Sheri Yan, etc.) they’ll just convict them of some financial crime and leave all the treason related things completely out of the whole thing.
Nonsense. They knew exactly what they were getting.
Its clear that large bytes of data were moved off the secure network, said another source close to the investigation, adding that Awan and the other four staffers under investigation had full and complete access to lawmakers e-mails, calendars, schedules, hearing notes, meeting notes and memos and other sensitive information.
Investigators are trying to determine if any classified information was compromised. Although the network that was breached is an unclassified system, its possible that members or staff cleared to handle classified information inadvertently sent such information in e-mails after getting classified briefings, sources believe.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
so who is allegedly investigating this espionage? comey? crowd strike? sessions? mccabe? mcmasters?
Few Details Known About Obamas Three Weeks in Pakistan
By Patrick Goodenough | November 3, 2008
(CNSNews.com) As the presidential election campaign draws to a close, unanswered questions about Barack Obamas three-week visit to Pakistan 27 years ago continue to cause unease in some quarters, but his campaign has revealed few details.
Last April during a San Francisco fundraiser, Obama referred briefly to a visit he had made to Pakistan during his college years.
Campaign press secretary Bill Burton subsequently gave inquiring journalists a few facts. Obama had visited Pakistan for about three weeks in 1981, after visiting his mother in Indonesia. He had traveled with a college friend whose family lived in Karachi. He had also visited Hyderabad in India, Burton said.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/few-details-known-about-obama-s-three-weeks-pakistan
Is a scandal still a scandal if the so-called mainstream media ignores it? Just like if a tree falls in the forest but no one is there to hear it, does it still make a sound? The answer to both rhetorical questions is a resounding yes. The only problem when Dems are engulfed in scandals is that very few of them are ever held to account. This is as caustic to our Republic as lye is to a human body.
When is it going to burgeon over to the MSM?
,,,,,, doesn’t this MSATTER eclipse the Russia hacking fraud ???
Logic dictates that DWS colluded with the Amrans and should be executed for treason...
Americans always allow themselves to be confused by this "spy" concept. So here are a few items to clarify it.
A spy is an agent of an outside entity; e.g. foreign government. He is normally trained by the entity he is an agent for. And if detained, will normally be acknowledged and supported by that entity. A spy buys secrets from traitors.
A traitor sells secrets. A traitor may receive some training. But that is irrelevant to his status. The traitor is not an agent of an outside entity. He is a betrayer of the entity he legally owes loyalty to.
Awan is a traitor. So are those who knowingly employed him.