[pepsionice]

What the news media has become....is simply an illusion. It’s like a magic act where some elephant is moved from one side of the stage to another. After a while, the public figures out the movement trick. In this case, the news media has relatively no new tricks left to play upon....just repeat and repeat.

[goldstategop]

You can take the fake news media apart - by ridiculing them.

Then watch them say and write stupid things.

Its like training a dog.

[bankwalker]

Thanks for posting.

[circlecity]

All journalism today is tabloid journalism.

[Spok]

I was in college during Watergate. The pattern became that every new disclosure was cause for outrage, and no fact could be repeated too many times. They’d produce another ‘expert’ who would analyze the event then feign outrage; over and over and over. Ask most people today ‘what were Nixon’s crimes, other than the break in at the Watergate?’ They can’t answer because it was all about feelings, impressions and manufactured hysteria. There was no substance. And it’s happening again.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Bkmrk.

[GOPJ]

Then, The New York Times decided to write a piece on the controversy.

The first question is why?

Why would the Times write about a controversy begun by a few members of a community orchestra in California?

I am quite certain that one reason was to protect the left. My original column on the issue, titled "Can a Conservative Conduct an Orchestra?" went viral. And it made the left look bad. Not only was the left trying to prevent conservatives from speaking; it was now trying to prevent a conservative from not speaking -- from just making music.

The left keeps attempting to grind their boot into our faces and we keep complaining about it...

Then the the thug arm of the Democrat Party - the press - jumps in... on the side of 'elite' totalitarians. "Are you Trumpers complaining about the boot?" "How DARE YOU."

We're going to win this one... but it gets scary sometimes.

[GOPJ]

Then, The New York Times decided to write a piece on the controversy.

The first question is why?

Why would the Times write about a controversy begun by a few members of a community orchestra in California?

I am quite certain that one reason was to protect the left. My original column on the issue, titled "Can a Conservative Conduct an Orchestra?" went viral. And it made the left look bad. Not only was the left trying to prevent conservatives from speaking; it was now trying to prevent a conservative from not speaking -- from just making music.

The left's grinding their boot into our faces and we keep complaining about it...

Then the the thug arm of the Democrat Party - the press - jumps in... on the side of 'elite' totalitarians. "Are you Trumpers complaining about the boot?" "How DARE YOU."

We're going to win this one... but it gets scary sometimes.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Journalism is bad news. That is their business, and anyone who tries to perform journalism without focusing on bad news will fail as a businessman.

Given that fact, anyone who claims that journalism is objective is equating negativity with objectivity. And I put it to you that "the conceit that negativity is objectivity” is a very serviceable definition of “cynicism.”

I do not say that everyone who falls for the con that "journalism is objective” is a cynic - at some point that would take in just about everyone:

The natural disposition is always to believe. It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing. - Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)

But I do say that anyone who falls for the con and is not disturbed by the reality of what journalism actually is is a cynic. Which includes all leftists.

Note, however, that cynicism toward society - journalistic cynicism - does not correspond to cynicism toward government. To the contrary,

SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness POSITIVELY by uniting our affections, the latter NEGATIVELY by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.

Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him, out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others. - Thomas Paine, Common Sense (1776)

indicates that skepticism toward society is the very raison d'être of government. Thus, cynicism toward society corresponds to faith in government - not cynicism towards it.

[M Kehoe]

Bttt.

5.56mm

[Yaelle]

Dennis is all about clarity, and this great, simple, brilliant essay proves he nails clarity on the media situation.

[Skooz]

bfl